What's new

The Complete Military History of France

Martin

Active member
Administrator
The Complete Military History of France

Gallic Wars - Lost.
In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.

Hundred Years War - Mostly lost
France was saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman."

Italian Wars - Lost.
France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.

Wars of Religion - No wins.
France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots

Thirty Years War -
France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.

War of Devolution - Tied.
Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.

The Dutch War - Tied
War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.

War of the Spanish Succession - Lost.
The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.

American Revolution - Vicarious Victory
In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."

French Revolution - Won,
Primarily due to the fact that the opponent was also French.

The Napoleonic Wars - Lost.
Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.

The Franco-Prussian War - Lost.
Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.

World War I - Tied and on the way to losing
France is saved by the United States. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.

World War II - Lost.
Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.

War in Indochina - Lost.
French forces plead sickness, take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu.

Algerian Rebellion - Lost.
Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.

War on Terrorism -
France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fails after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.

The Lesson to Be Learned from History-
Don't waste time wondering "Can we count on the French?"
With history as our guide, the only real question is "How long until France collapses and looks for someone else to pick up the pieces?"

/me waves to Hacktarux :p
 

Hacktarux

Emulator Developer
Moderator
:D:

It's pretty funny to see how they can undig things i've never ever heard :p
It's also inacurate but i don't care i won't argue on it, anyway i wouldn't be proud to be part of a warish nation...

I'm just wondering why US are all spoted on French president coz actually he's not the only one with this opinion. The most important ones are : Germany, Russia, China... Maybe it's more easy to laught at us but remember that we're not the only ones, and i believe uk people are strongly against this war actualy...
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
Yeah the majority are against the war without UN support, however a lot of yanks are telling us we want it :rolleyes:
 

Eagle

aka Alshain
Moderator
Hacktarux said:
:D:

It's pretty funny to see how they can undig things i've never ever heard :p
It's also inacurate but i don't care i won't argue on it, anyway i wouldn't be proud to be part of a warish nation...

I'm just wondering why US are all spoted on French president coz actually he's not the only one with this opinion. The most important ones are : Germany, Russia, China... Maybe it's more easy to laught at us but remember that we're not the only ones, and i believe uk people are strongly against this war actualy...

Its because in the past we have helped out the French a lot and now they refuse to help us. We cant say that about Germany, Russia or China becuase we really havnt helped them much.

That said I'm against the war too actually. As a matter of fact its most likely that more than half of the US Citizens are against the war. I live with an Army recruiter who is against the war. I think the Bush administration and his do or die followers are the only ones interested in war.
 

Hacktarux

Emulator Developer
Moderator
Or maybe we're trying to help you to not make something stupid after all :p

More seriously i can say you what we hear on news here. France wants to find a pacifist solution to destroy weapons in Irak but the president is also saying that if no other solutions are possible the war will be needed. The main difference is that we trust UN inspectors and we understand that they need some time to do their work. I know that on the fuck tv news channel they're telling nasty things about us but believe me they're far from being exhaustive.
 

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
You forgot about Vietnam, France lost vietnam before the US ever went in. Actualy, top that, france was the entire reason that vietnam was in turmoil. France was doing the same thing to the vietnamese that the english did to us prior to our revolution (actualy no, what france was doing was much worse). France realy wanted to win that war too, because they had a shitload of money to gain out of it.

At least the US just lost that war because we realy had no intention of winning. (look at the circumstances of operation linebacker I and II, and you'll see exactly what I am talking about)

Speaking of the gulf war, a guy in my english class who was in the marine corps was just reactivated. It's remotely possible that I could be reactivated as well. (in all honsty though, I wouldn't mind).
 

Hacktarux

Emulator Developer
Moderator
Hehe, i was wondering what alpha would post here :p
Well i have to admit that what happened in ex-indochina is a shame... not because we have lost it but because the reasons of the war was just as stupid as the reasons of the current iraq conflict...

Well anyway my point was that we don't mind helping United states militarily but only when it's needed and justified and this time it's not... (at least not yet).
 

mesman00

What's that...?
Eagle said:
We cant say that about Germany, Russia or China becuase we really havnt helped them much.

are we forgetting World War II. The united states saved the German people and the rest of Europe from complete domination by Hitler.

I'm no Bush advocate, but I am pro-war. Wether you want to believe it or not Sadam is doing things that he shouldn't be (i.e. weapons, inhumane treatment of citizens, etc), and will continue to do so if we do not stop him. Go in there, find that son of a bitch, gutlessly sluaghter him and his crazy son, and take care of business from there.
 
Last edited:

2fast4u

New member
Go in there

yeh ... easy as that :p erm .. must resist to vent ... aw fuck ... while we are getting in there we are killing a few thousand people who we are so noble claiming to liberate :saint: *cough* omg, hasnt anyone thought of this before? *cough* couldnt there be different solutions to this? *cough* oh shit, ketchup anyone?
 
Last edited:

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
mesman00 said:
are we forgetting World War II. The united states saved the German people and the rest of Europe from complete domination by Hitler.

Are we forgetting Nazi Germany was fighting on two fronts and would have eventually lost without America been dragged in?
 

Hacktarux

Emulator Developer
Moderator
mesman00 said:
I'm no Bush advocate, but I am pro-war. Wether you want to believe it or not Sadam is doing things that he shouldn't be (i.e. weapons, inhumane treatment of citizens, etc), and will continue to do so if we do not stop him. Go in there, find that son of a bitch, gutlessly sluaghter him and his crazy son, and take care of business from there.

I'm sorry to tell you that but it's not the more people you kill the bigger dick you have....

I understand the objectives you're describing but why not letting your frustration appart and try to think about real human ways to solve the problem ?? :)
 

mesman00

What's that...?
we've been tryin to solve the problem with real human ways for the past 5 years, where has it got us? Bush Sr. should have ended it when he had the chance, but he fuxored up
 

2fast4u

New member
mesman00 said:
we've been tryin to solve the problem with real human ways for the past 5 years, where has it got us? Bush Sr. should have ended it when he had the chance, but he fuxored up

wait a sec ... u call sanctions against the civilians a human way? besides, imo the reason the us wants to liberate the iraqis all of the sudden is just an excuse so well feel noble and dont notice that the war has different reason in the first place (and i aint gonna repeat all that, my fingers are gonna fall off). thru the whole debate, we havent heard jack about wanting to liberate the iraqi people. this started after the massive protests earlier this month. lovely ... :getlost:
 

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
Well, if Bush Senior did get rid of saddam, we wouldn't be in this mess right now. Just doing so at the time seemed too politicaly incorrect. PC is a stubborn concept IMO.

It's a shame how most people act these days. For example, al qeida destroys our WTC, then several people want to cower in fear and protest attacks against terrorist organizations, in fear of more attacks from terrorists. They don't seem to realize that by cowering like that, the terrorists gain more of the power they lust after. Hugs and kisses aren't going to do shit, unless american women are willing to forefeit all of their rights, we end democracy entirely, etc etc etc.

Know what I would say to the ex-americans who are being human shields for the terrorist organizations?

"This is going to hurt me.....a HELL of a lot LESS than its going to hurt you" ....

*sound of clicking metal*

"Treason is a deadly sin."

So far as iraq specificaly.... there are a shitload of iraqis who moved to the US prior to the first gulf war, and from what I gather, not a single one of them protests what the US is doing. Gee, I wonder why? I also wonder what the general consensus in kuwait is as well.
 
Last edited:

mesman00

What's that...?
AlphaWolf said:
Well, if Bush Senior did get rid of saddam, we wouldn't be in this mess right now. Just doing so at the time seemed too politicaly incorrect. PC is a stubborn concept IMO.

It's a shame how most people act these days. For example, al qeida destroys our WTC, then several people want to cower in fear and protest attacks against terrorist organizations, in fear of more attacks from terrorists. They don't seem to realize that by cowering like that, the terrorists gain more of the power they lust after. Hugs and kisses aren't going to do shit, unless american women are willing to forefeit all of their rights, we end democracy entirely, etc etc etc.

Know what I would say to the ex-americans who are being human shields for the terrorist organizations?

"This is going to hurt me.....a HELL of a lot LESS than its going to hurt you" ....

*sound of clicking metal*

"Treason is a deadly sin."

So far as iraq specificaly.... there are a shitload of iraqis who moved to the US prior to the first gulf war, and from what I gather, not a single one of them protests what the US is doing. Gee, I wonder why? I also wonder what the general consensus in kuwait is as well.

/me agrees with AlphaWolf
 

2fast4u

New member
AlphaWolf said:

It's a shame how most people act these days. For example, al qeida destroys our WTC, then several people want to cower in fear and protest attacks against terrorist organizations, in fear of more attacks from terrorists. They don't seem to realize that by cowering like that, the terrorists gain more of the power they lust after. Hugs and kisses aren't going to do shit, unless american women are willing to forefeit all of their rights, we end democracy entirely, etc etc etc.

Know what I

ironically u dont seem to attack terrorist organizations, but nations that get in your way...im sure bombing the shit out of the iraqi people will make terror and support for terror decrease rapidly...*rolls eyes* kind of contradictive, aint it?

about ending democracy btw, thats basically what bush is doing right now. all i say is homeland security.
 

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
2fast4u said:
ironically u dont seem to attack terrorist organizations, but nations that get in your way...im sure bombing the shit out of the iraqi people will make terror and support for terror decrease rapidly...*rolls eyes* kind of contradictive, aint it?

about ending democracy btw, thats basically what bush is doing right now. all i say is homeland security.

In case you haven't noticed, iraq does harbor terrorists. Upon declaration of the "war on terror", we said that any nations that harbor terrorists will get retribution. That was the origional reason we targeted iraq to begin with. If you just give terrorists a bunch of third world countries to hide in, that does you no good.

And remember what we talked about earlier, germany and france could be after oil just as much as the US is, assuming it is after oil at all.
 

Eagle

aka Alshain
Moderator
mesman00 said:
are we forgetting World War II. The united states saved the German people and the rest of Europe from complete domination by Hitler.

Last I heard that was a three way coalition between the US, England, and Russia. Oh, and Russia did more of the work than the US & English did combined.
 

Eagle

aka Alshain
Moderator
AlphaWolf said:
Well, if Bush Senior did get rid of saddam, we wouldn't be in this mess right now. Just doing so at the time seemed too politicaly incorrect. PC is a stubborn concept IMO.

That would have been a bad idea and Bush knew this. I'm no Bush supporter, far from it in fact, but Bush's biggest mistake in his campaign was not explaining what he did to the American people. The fact of the matter is, he couldnt get rid of Saddam, we were not prepared to insert a puppet government at the time, and had we taken out Sadam, someone worse would have stepped in. No, he made the right decision there. Now we are ready to take over the country with a puppet government, in the event it is necessary, so nothing will hold us back. You have to remember to think of the concequences before you take action.
 

Top