What's new

So... what are we allowed to talk about these days?

Eagle

aka Alshain
Moderator
Well, I think you were right actualy. If it is not a public beta, and you got it through some means other than directly from the manufacturer. It is illegal. Basically if its creators had not inteded for it to be spread over the internet then it is illegal. The only way it would be legal is they posted it for download on a website. So I agree with Blizz's decision.
 
OP
Stalkid64

Stalkid64

Citizen(sixty)four
So if there is no difference in legailty, and you agree ROM's are the same thing... how can we freely discuss ROM's as if they were public domain?
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
You don't get it do you, that thread was getting out of control, I did it because that thread was too ambiguous at the moment, we walk a fine enough line with ROMs as it is, but the thread was treating Doom3 as though it was a legal PD ROM or freeware even, there is a fine line between what is and isn't allowed and I judged it to be over that line

I think that sums it up stalkid
 

TigerTron

New member
blizz said:
how can it be more illegal than a piracy of a full game when they're both the same crime! and that's the reason why!

You don't get it do you, that thread was getting out of control, I did it because that thread was too ambiguous at the moment, we walk a fine enough line with ROMs as it is, but the thread was treating Doom3 as though it was a legal PD ROM or freeware even, there is a fine line between what is and isn't allowed and I judged it to be over that line

If you don't like that, fine, but don't get all "l33t h@x0r" on me when you blatantly have worked or do currently work in the games industry! How would you feel if that was a game you worked on? A technology you worked hard to develop as a secret for the future profits and stability of your job?

edit:

you can argue that Doom3 is secure enough in that's it's far into it's development cycle, but I can assure you that there are dev teams out there, working on any platform who will have taken a look at that alpha and learned a few lessons from it, and undoubtedly taken some ideas down

First, i did not manage to see this "scandalous" thread That this refers to.

But i have to say that as i know RatTrap has helpd out with alot of gaming sites and has helpd web-developers working in game-development houses before. He actually has a few good friends in a few well known companies that have visited him in Sweden.

I know this because i am very interested in that market. It can open many doors for us since we web-developers and -designers are in hardship because of the few jobs here. J and i have been on the way a few times, to start our own game-related website. He has wanted to make it game only and not include any type or form of emulation. But he says he has made some good friends here, and we are looking into a way of maybe being able to live out of both this and the gaming comunity.

(I am sorry, i think i got a bit off the topic)

He has told me alot about this kind of thing. He has said that the people who emulate a system are seen and sometimes hated just as much as the people who download a game for the PC. Because there is no diference. Downloading a PC game and running it on your computer is abit more wrong maybe? (same thing, i think), but that does not mean that when downloading a rom less wrong.

So if you are going to be fair, you have to be fair so all over the place. Then you will have to stop talking about how to get a game working all together. Both rom and PC-Game. The thing i think is wrong, is if someone was directing someone to a URL directly to the "demo". That would be the same as your rule about Rom-linking.
 
OP
Stalkid64

Stalkid64

Citizen(sixty)four
Which as far as I know, never happened. If mentioning a p2p program counts, then we really are in a sorry state of affairs... you mention anything and someone can find it on a google search these days anyway.
I think you're about the 2nd person in this thread who has realised what I actually meant though. Good for you.
Now then; Would I personally care if a game I was linked to was leaked this early on, at alpha stage? No. Yet yes, I know where the money goes for real. I know the time and effort it takes firsthand. I also know though what a huge difference the months that have followed since that demo build (which according to Carmack's statement was never meant to be leaked or even interactive...)will have already made to the final game. At the level that demo was at, the engine was still being built, and there was a massive way to go. As anyone who has seen and tried it will attest, it's literally hanging together with sticky-taped code. If all the features were in at that stage, damn would it be a disappointment. If this was a "feature complete" version, yes I would object slightly, only on the grounds that ideas could be borrowed. It'll ruin nothing by being out there, and especially not simple fps-rate discussions.
 

Smiff

Emutalk Member
TigerTron said:

So if you are going to be fair, you have to be fair so all over the place. Then you will have to stop talking about how to get a game working all together. Both rom and PC-Game. The thing i think is wrong, is if someone was directing someone to a URL directly to the "demo". That would be the same as your rule about Rom-linking.


I haven't read the whole thread, so i might be misfiring here, but I thought the EmuTalk rules were about protecting EmuTalk from legal action, and keeping it on topic, not about the moralities of the activities of EmuTalk's users (?) For example, I don't want people posting links to ROMs in the Project64 forum because ROMs don't specificaly relate to Project64. Martin doesn't want those links in the General N64 emulation forum - that might be because he thinks that could get his shut down by Nintendo's laywers, or because he doesn't want a warez site. Both reasonable but different reasons, I think.

What i do want clarified is how closely you can link to material. Take the following categories, each getting less obviously "bad":

1) direct download web link
2) link to webpage with direct downloads
3) link to page that links to a page with downloads
4) name of a P2P app
5) general reference to "P2P apps"
6) reference to a search engine (?)
7) something even more vague, maybe filename/existence of the ROM

then you have grey areas, for example an ed2k link, an md5 hash,... I don't know where to put these.

It's up to the people who own the site to decide where they want to draw the line there. I think it's simple and best to say "any discussion about where to get warez is not allowed" including e.g. directing people to search engines and apps, because by doing that you are giving tacit approval (=bad) BUT i would (this is not my site, so don't take this as the real rules) allow (1) discussion of material that may or may not be warezed, with the presumption of innocence and (2) discussion of P2P apps - IN THE CORRECT FORUMS! - because both on their own are fine - it's linking the material with the method of distribution that's going to get people into trouble. And yes, this is very hard to moderate.

I'll give some examples:

"You can get Doom3 using Kazaa" (true, but does anyone really need to be told this?)
"Doom3 has been leaked. BTW, did you know Kazaa is a good P2P app?" (both pieces of information fine on their own. What about together? Technically moot, this post could never happen on EmuTalk because the first sentence would be in a post in Talk of the Town and the second in TechTalk).

Maybe all that really needs to be enforced is that people stay on topic?
 
Last edited:

Josep

eyerun4phun
well if smiff is right, then its ok to start another thread;) technically, but someone has to lay down the rules somewheres
 

crhylove

Banned
i don't know, the forums need moderating, but there has been an overflow of low brow n00b beating and thread closing lately that have lowered our standard of surfing significantly. i never know anyone who acts cool around cops, and some of the mods have come across as copish lately (not saying i could do better, i probly couldn't), but i think that is part of the reason for some of the negativity over all lately.

including long timers that were cool ducking out altogether.

everyone needs to take a deep breath, and maybe smoke a doob with
<-------- uncle crhylove
 

DuDe

Emu64 Staff
Stalkid64 said:
/intense sarcasm mode
Hey, mods! He mentioned Doom 3! Quick, get him too! Promoting warez! Blatant advertising!
/end intense sarcasm mode
Or any of the other made-up garbage I've just found in my "warnings" list. Yes, for anyone who wants to know, I'm just gonna mention that apparently I'm a 10-point worthy racist for example despite the fact I tolerate every viewpoint and race and religion (again some people need to look up Wicca I think...), but only a 2-point worthy spammer. And despite only EVER having sent PM's to Martin and Jaz who never seem to mind, I warrant a 5-point PM abuse rating. Bizarre huh? Oh and I've not just been requesting Warez but ROM's too, apparently... those must be the invisible posts I make, right?
Frankly if you guys are gonna start on me as you so obviously want to for some reason, please at least stick to the truth. There are so many blatant lies in that warnings list I have to question decisions being made even more now. At the very least I want an apology over that "racist" remark. That's where most of the anger in this post comes from, as that is just completely fabricated and far from my nature.

Don't be stupid, you haven't even been warned through the warnings system yet. What you saw is merely a list of possible warnings.

EDIT : oh come on, at least have the guts to admit that you were wrong, rather than just deleting your post. You're quoted you know.
 
Last edited:

DuDe

Emu64 Staff
Well, he's the only one who is blaming us for "going after him", isn't he?
 
Last edited:

Macca

New member
yeh, we've got a few posts from people thinking something was up, but really we just hate you all and are going to ban everyone :)
 

blizz

New member
Macca said:
yeh, we've got a few posts from people thinking something was up, but really we just hate you all and are going to ban everyone :)

you're not supposed to tell them that ;)
 
TigerTron said:

So if you are going to be fair, you have to be fair so all over the place. Then you will have to stop talking about how to get a game working all together. Both rom and PC-Game. The thing i think is wrong, is if someone was directing someone to a URL directly to the "demo". That would be the same as your rule about Rom-linking.

exactly, this is about an attitude used in a post.. Jaz summed it up when he said the word debate is referenced as a flame war.. and instead of spending the whole time telling stallkid he was wrong how about accepting some blame here.. 6 months ago this would not hav caused an issue.. hell i've seen martin post direct connect hubs thats how much he cares about legality! can we at least act like adults around here?

"he said something in a nasty tone, he's so wrong, im going to close his thread" is the message being set out and to be honest its painful, more mods with a twitchy close finger doesn't solve anything... martin giving them all a spanking does, thank god he's back, he's basically kept the peace here for so long its scary how much of an impact his absence made :plain2:
 
OP
Stalkid64

Stalkid64

Citizen(sixty)four
I deleted the post this morning in recognition that it was a mistake, and simply hadn't the time to edit it before work. Fair enough - misunderstanding, mistake, I'm human and as far as I'm concerned its forgotten. Obviously I'm not the only one who was momentarily confused by the appearance of the "view warnings" tag when I logged in, what with it being right up with PM's and all... but its still obvious why it has appeared.
DuDe - it was a mistake. My bad, but you can hardly blame the assumption going on how I'm being treated lately. Anyway, done and over as far as I'm concerned.
sytaylor - I *did* accept the fact that I shouldn't perhaps have mentioned rather obvious p2p software several times in this thread, but that's hardly telling people anything they don't know already. Even vamp` admitted he was perhaps overly hasty in closing the thread, which I respect him greatly for saying. You're right though where you say if this had come up six months or so ago in the context of the thread (indeed the title itself gave the context as something like "Doom 3 alpha discussion for those who have it.") it wouldn't have been given a second thought. We'd all have jumped on the thread and talked about it, as we used to back in the fun days when a new ROM suddenly appeared playable.

And for the most part for those who never saw it, it was simple fps/config/tech spec discussion by people who ALREADY HAD IT... people interested and curious about it enough to have gone out and tracked it down, nothing promoting piracy or boasting of ownership as it seems to have been twisted to - indeed how do you boast about ownership when the thread was intended by its very title for people who also have it? I believe in letting people decide for themselves what they do with information, and the leak was hardly a sudden revelation on my part - heck, even slashdot and penny arcade have used the news. Why should we be any different? It's a talking point, and one I find interesting to debate as there are so many sides to it.
The reaction was out of proportion to what was going on in the thread, simple as that. This thread has had its value already in that people are talking again more than they have for a long while about what's going on around here. Personally I'm finding it interesting, especially now I remember the direct-connect hubs/Martin aspect.
I still don't think its any more wrong to discuss how to get Doom 3 alpha demo running better or what frame rate someone gets on what equipment, than to have the same discussions or sharing tips for how to get certain ROM's running better on emulators, or what fps rate you get in Majora's Mask. I'd have great value on Martin's own opinion of that seeing as how he owns the site, as in the light the thread was started and running, it was discussion pure and simple and FUN... without the admitted (but only small) errors of p2p reference, I didn't think he'd have a problem with it or I wouldn't have started it in the first place, and I don't see why the mods should either if thats the case.
Finally, to sytaylors remarks again - yes, it is amazing how messed up things get if Martin disappears for a while. It happens every time, too. The site used to go very strongly on staff/member interaction which seems to have taken a back seat recently. Even the "Great Flame War" had its purpose and was allowed to run. Member interaction was greatly entertaining and reason alone to visit, as it should be... even the surreal world of "the GBA Bar" survived unhindered even though it was a complete waste of our time. It let us talk, figure out how various members thought, let friendships form. That was what made it so enjoyable. That's what I'd love to see back. And its something even this thread is doing.
Discussion remains open here, feel free to debate. Already I'm looking forward to reading responses again, something which hasn't happened in a long time.
 

Trotterwatch

Active member
Steps are currently being taken to improve the board, for a short time it had descended into nothing more than meaningless spam, and ever increasing flame wars. Of course some of us moderators have acted a little hastily at times, and have perhaps closed threads a little prematurely. I don't think anyone of us would disagree with that at all.

We are all human though, and errors are always going to be made. The benefit we have though, is in hindsight. The same mistakes will hopefully only happen once or twice, before the lesson taught by those mistakes is absorbed fully.

I had read 95% of the thread that started this debate, and considered it to be fairly harmless, however at one point there was a hint that anyone who knew where the leaked demo was available should PM you, and others who wanted to know where it was. Closing the thread was a mistake, but that was all it was, a slight but understandable nonetheless overeaction. If someone had hinted about being PMed about the whereabouts of a ROM, this behaviour would also have been stamped upon.

I understand that later on in said thread, you were not discussing how to obtain the demo. This is mainly where your grievence is centered, and I do understand that, but I also understand how the moderators felt it was a grey area.

Anyways, stick with us Stalkid - your opinions are valued, and appreciated. I am pleased with the way this thread has been going up until now, it has provoked much debate - all of it good, I am happy to note. :)
 

DuDe

Emu64 Staff
Stalkid64 said:

DuDe - it was a mistake. My bad, but you can hardly blame the assumption going on how I'm being treated lately.

Oh for god sakes, just cut it out, the "treatment" that you've received wasn't anyhow different than the "treatment" that other users receive. You know, let's change that : you've been treated better than most of the users around here, since your case has spawned three threads - yes, three threads, I doubt any other user was ever given that much chance to talk crap about the mods and their policies around here as much as you did.
 
Last edited:

Jaz

Ex-Mod
Trotterwatch said:
Anyways, stick with us Stalkid - your opinions are valued, and appreciated.

Totally agree with you on that one. There are alot of people who I wouldn't miss if they left this board (and I'm sure I'm on many peoples lists), but Stalkid64 is one genuine guy who knows his shit. And knows whats what around here. I'm not saying that I agree with everything he's been saying, but I still think some of us are treating him as if we know everything and he knows shit. Agian, just a personal opinion.

In my eyes, as far as staff are concerned, I think we need to really lose the them and us attitude. Or sooner rather than later, this entire board will be made up of simply staff members.

On a more positive note: I have noticed that things have improved big time over the last week, so that's cool! :cool:
 

Top