What's new

Rare is being bought by...

Stezo2k

S-2K
yea they have made some gr8 games :) especially Goldeneye & DKC, those games are most my fave games ever i just hope m$ doesnt buy them, id h8 to see another DK/Goldeneye for xbox :(

Stez
 

Anchel

The Xpaniard
Don't worry. Nintendo removed the DK license from Rareware 'cos they were expecting this. You'll never see a Donkey Kong game for a system that is not Nintendo
 

Stalkid64

Citizen(sixty)four
Anchel said:
Rare is for me one of the greatest videogame companies ever.
Games like Perfect Dark, Banjo-Kazooie/Tooie, Conker's BDF, Donkey Kong 64, Donkey Kong Country 1/2/3, Diddy Kong Racing, and more have been my favourites all along.
Perfect Dark - multiplayer-biased otherwise fairly low grade copy of Goldeneye. A pointless, ever more jerky `hi res` mode. Aliens... *yawn*. Skedar King? Been there, done that. Actually pretty much the only thing single-player PD had that kept things going were the hoverbike and guard reactions - and the psychosis gun for a while I suppose. The levels stank of blandness after a few plays. The cheats were either pointless or just uninspired. Goldeneye was great; this was a cash-in.
BK was like a Mario64 clone of the kind usually stuck on the PS, right down to the triple jump and button-bashing, central hub. And the less said about the few horrendous (and pretty easy to find) bugs in the game that sneaked through the better. It was predictable, easy and soulless.
With BT Rare made players wait a few years to see how the secret areas would be opened up... then let them down terribly. As the first game was like a PS clone, this was like a PS sequel.
Conker was funny, but had some needlessly frustrating sections thrown in very obviously just to extend percieved play time. The less said about multiplayer, the better.
Donkey Kong 64? Never played. Any game that asks me to shell out a stupid price for an add-on I already own is in trouble though... DKC 1 was good (and indeed had some superb music), but Earthworm Jim was better. DKC2/3 were more of the same. DKR was bland, with some of the worst character design sins ever commited in the history of gaming, though had a few redeeming points in its structure and longevity.
Jet Force Gemini however was great. At least, for a while anyway it was. Some lovely graphics, a refreshingly straight structure, a reasonable challenge... then it all went horribly wrong and introduced `backtracking` over areas previously left finished.
The problem with Rare? They can do games, they can`t do characters. Goldeneye - James Bond, great and well-known character with a history, plus a good row of known supporting characters and realism. Perfect Dark - Joanna Dark, who as far as I could tell had no real story behind her, and a plot so obvious and uninspiring they could only make it more dull by filling it with non-entities like... er, what was the Datadyne boss called again? And... that guy who was an alien! Yeah... him. Rare characters are lifeless and uninspired, generally. They should`ve put Wil Overton in charge of character design instead. Nintendo characters have personality, created by an artist who has managed to give them what most games are missing these days. Something Sega seem to have figured out how to do on occasion too.
As for the DK-removal, that was more down to copyright and other internal issues and since Rare can`t do characters to save themselves... well, it`ll be interesting to see where they go from here.
 

blizz

New member
I can see Rare breathing life into some of the franchises Microsoft owns at first, for two reasons, 1) it gives time to produce a "great" game which they are oh so fucking going to need, and 2) pushes a and MS Rare game out straight off the bat which they also need

and there are some promising Microsoft (Star Lancer) games but they've always lacked that special something that Rare might be able to provide, or it might not, especially if Rare keeps they're crazy internal structure from what I've heard about it, which may be a reason Nintendo had decided to wash their hands of Rare
 

nudetothis

New member
Hey, at least now the Xbox will have no shortage of "kiddy games" -- at least that's what the Xbox fans were saying about most of the games Rare made for Nintendo.
 

Stezo2k

S-2K
Anchel said:
Don't worry. Nintendo removed the DK license from Rareware 'cos they were expecting this. You'll never see a Donkey Kong game for a system that is not Nintendo

they should of done it with goldeneye/PD :( oh well it cant be helped

ill probably end up gettin an xbox anyway due to the excellent emulation possibilities

Stez
 

Anchel

The Xpaniard
Damn you Windows!
Damn you Microsoft!
Damn you Bill Gates!
Still, Rareware games were fun (and they still are fun to me). But I'll never buy an Xbox to play Rare games, no matter how good they are
 

iq_132

Banned
Stez.. That's the only reason I'd get an x-box too, but odds are that when Emulation for the X-box gets to the point that Emulation for the PC is, There'll Be y-box or a Z-box or maybe a Billy-box. PCs will always be better :)
 

Lex

New member
Allnatural said:
...Microsoft? :!!!:

There have been rumors of Rare ending its Nintendo-exclusive relationship, and talk of the same issue here in this thread.

Now The Register puts up this story. Sad times these are.:plain:

WTF :devil: :devil: :devil:
 

Stezo2k

S-2K
iq_132 said:
Stez.. That's the only reason I'd get an x-box too, but odds are that when Emulation for the X-box gets to the point that Emulation for the PC is, There'll Be y-box or a Z-box or maybe a Billy-box. PCs will always be better :)

yea i know, but its gr8 to be playing an emulator on a console than playing it on pc, it just seems better on a console, and if its better emuation than the actual console, why not?

Stez
 

Top