What's new

Nintendo Wii sells like zomg

WhiteX

New member
Some news...

November 21, 2006 - In its quarterly financial statement call, GameStop revealed some surprising attach rate numbers for the PS3 and Wii. Sony's latest console saw a low attach rate of 1.5 games per console sold, with Madden NFL 07 and Resistance: Fall of Man the best-selling titles. Wii saw a "surprisingly good" attach rate of 3.0 games per system sold. Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess and Red Steel were the top sellers at GameStop and EB Games.

GameStop executives believe the low attach rate for PS3 is do to the "large percentage of PS3s resold at a huge premium." It is believed that once the PS3 is in the hands of "real gamers," PS3 titles should see a growth in attach rate.

Unbeknownst to anyone who has wandered into a GameStop, but second shipments of PS3 and Wii have arrived, either in warehouses or in stores (and therefore already sold out). It is expected that new shipments of each console will arrive weekly through the end of the year.
 

General Plot

Britchie Crazy
Couple that with the fact that most people are holding out for the titles that have made the PS3 sell so well (MGS4, FF13, etc...), I suspect that once the most anticipated games start hitting the market, the impact will show in the sales.;)
 

WhiteX

New member
Those are only news, man, no bashing.

EDIT: Is there a NDS sales figure forum signature or is it just kicking the dead horse?
 
Last edited:

t0rek

Wilson's Friend
General Plot said:
As games get more complex, it's only logical you'd need more buttons to accomadate the new controls

That philosophy justifies the wiimote, swinging a sword with your hand movement is very practical, a complex game with new accommodated controls.

The learning curve for the wiimote is very little. People of all ages get used to it easily, just think the first time you moved Mario in Super Mario 64, it feeled a little odd but you get used to it. Or the following example, even when is not a console example: To play the original Doom you didn't needed a mouse to point at your enemies, and the you control the character sight with the mouse. Quite simply
 

General Plot

Britchie Crazy
WhiteX said:
Those are only news, man, no bashing.
Wasn't bashing, just giving my thoughts on why the sales of games per console might also be low.;)

t0rek said:
That philosophy justifies the wiimote, swinging a sword with your hand movement is very practical, a complex game with new accommodated controls.
Call me old fashioned (maybe it's my age) but that idea of control doesn't appeal to me as much as the idea of moving around in a 3D environment with an analog stick did. And I still prefer it that way. I think it's the defacto of gaming for today's consoles.
 

t0rek

Wilson's Friend
Call me old fashioned (maybe it's my age) but that idea of control doesn't appeal to me as much as the idea of moving around in a 3D environment with an analog stick did. And I still prefer it that way. I think it's the defacto of gaming for today's consoles.

Well the wiimote still uses an analog stick with the nunchuk add-on. As you said the analog stick has been the standard for consoles in a very long time, but not because of that it means is superior or inferior, or that the wii approach is inadequate. Even when you are not going to buy the Wii, you should at least test how it feels using the wiimote, it's not like trying something gross you know ;)
 

General Plot

Britchie Crazy
In the time of the 16 bit (and part of the 32 bit era) when all we haad were digital gamepads, it was obvious as 3D was growing that we needed something more. Enter the analog stick. It made up for what the digital pad lacked. This made the analog stick necessary. However, graphics have gotten better since then, but the overall design of games really hasn't changed much (you get more detail, but it's still walking around in a 3D environment). This means something like the Wiimote wasn't really necessary, as the same play can be done on analog. That's the difference. There really isn't any need for it, it's just a new concept that's attempting to give the feeling of VR, which from what I can tell, still doesn't quite give that experience.;)
 
Last edited:

t0rek

Wilson's Friend
AFAIK Nintendo hasn't marketed the Wii as virtual reality. The fact that games are still 3D doesn't mean that the wiimote is unnecesary, is just a different approach of gameplay (that could never be done with a analog stick). In other words a different way to play games and it has been proved that is not difficult to learn to use it
 

ScottJC

At your service, dood!
Are you even listening to us General Plot? The Wii does have an analog stick, it's used in combination with the pointer technology. Uses in games for this has a lot of potential, imagine command and conquer on the thing - Using the pointer like a mouse, almost like a PC rts - and shoot em ups... you walk around with the analog stick and shoot at people with the wiiremote.

Make no mistake, the analog stick is a necessary thing for this setup to work its not all done with the wii remote.
 
Last edited:

General Plot

Britchie Crazy
ScottJC said:
Are you even listening to us General Plot? The Wii does have an analog stick, it's used in combination with the pointer technology. Uses in games for this has a lot of potential, imagine command and conquer on the thing - Using the pointer like a mouse, almost like a PC rts - and shoot em ups... you walk around with the analog stick and shoot at people with the wiiremote.

Make no mistake, the analog stick is a necessary thing for this setup to work its not all done with the wii remote.
I never said it wasn't there. My interpretation is that the lack of BUTTONS and lack of right analog stick the Wiimote has is because that's where the movement comes in. I simply used analog as a comparison for a need versus movement which isn't a need.;)
 

Doomulation

?????????????????????????
I have to wait till december 8th for my Nintendo Wii; Who knows why we have to wait extra for em... Trying to import one from america especially now is neigh near impossible and will be for quite a while... you may have to buy it locally this time.

No deal!
I will import whatever anyone says. I just need a store that sells the console. I know there is a lot of demand - but I'll wait. I will not get it locally, however.
Oh and, no, General Plot isn't listening to us. You should know that by now.
 

ScottJC

At your service, dood!
There's more buttons than you think there is, on the Nunchuck (Left) Theres the analog stick and 2 trigger buttons, on the Wiiremote (Right) There is eight buttons if you include the dpad (which is like C controls on the n64) inc one on the back of the remote itself.

So, 10 buttons... a pointer at the screen and an analog stick isn't enough to play games, plus the motion detection. eh? Get the facts please. There's only about 14 buttons on the 360 pad and it doesn't have the motion sensing ability.

You do NOT NEED a right analog stick with the wii motes pointer functionality. I mean come on, what would you rather do, use the right analog stick on your xbox360 to move your gun up and shoot or just simply point at the screen where your enemy is and hit Z.
 
Last edited:

revl8er

That Damn Good
The 2nd analog stick isn't needed, since the wii remote can be used to look around. The ps2 has 10 buttons that are used for the games when u count L3 and R3. 14 if u count the D-Pad. The Wii has 7 buttons 11 buttons if u count the D-pad and can control as good as any game I have played so far. The point I'm making is that just because it doesn't have a lot of unneeded buttons doesn't mean its inferior. If anything, it makes the game more fun.

General Plot said:
Call me old fashioned (maybe it's my age) but that idea of control doesn't appeal to me as much as the idea of moving around in a 3D environment with an analog stick did. And I still prefer it that way. I think it's the defacto of gaming for today's consoles.

I came from the time of the Atari days, but you have to understand that things change. Remember back in the day, consoles had joysticks. After a few years, consoles went to the directional pad. Then after that controllers had analog. What's wrong with Nintendo taking the next step in using motion sensors that actually work. I'm pretty sure everybody here remembers all the failed attempts such as the Power Glove and the Sega Activator which were complete failures. The concept was great, but they couldnt get it right. The point i'm making is that when time changes so must technology. There really isn't anything you can do about it except not buying the product. Sure it could fail, but the way it's looking so far, its gonna be great.
 
Last edited:

General Plot

Britchie Crazy
revl8er said:
I came from the time of the Atari days, but you have to understand that things change. Remember back in the day, consoles had joysticks. After a few years, consoles went to the directional pad. Then after that controllers had analog. What's wrong with Nintendo taking the next step in using motion sensors that actually work. I'm pretty sure everybody here remembers all the failed attempts such as the Power Glove and the Sega Activator which were complete failures. The concept was great, but they couldnt get it right. The point i'm making is that when time changes so must technology. There really isn't anything you can do about it except not buying the product. Sure it could fail, but the way it's looking so far, its gonna be great.
Buddy, I'm 30, OK? I had a game system that ran on a 9 Volt battery, I used to pwn in Yars Revenge, etc... This isn't anything I'm new to. I know what I like and what appeals to me, and no amount of pushing on ANYONE'S part is going to change my mind.;)
 

Doomulation

?????????????????????????
Yes, because you're a Sony fanboy and love everything they do. And you would never, ever consider another system and therefore everything on that system HAS to be good. And the Rev controller is too different, it's like an Analog stick replacing the D-pad, so it HAS to be bad, even though you haven't tried it!
 

rcgamer

the old guy
Buddy, I'm 30, OK? I had a game system that ran on a 9 Volt battery, I used to pwn in Yars Revenge, etc... This isn't anything I'm new to. I know what I like and what appeals to me, and no amount of pushing on ANYONE'S part is going to change my mind.;)

LOL, you're 30 and you say pwn. Sorry, just found it humorous.
 

ScottJC

At your service, dood!
Buddy, I'm 30, OK? I had a game system that ran on a 9 Volt battery, I used to pwn in Yars Revenge, etc... This isn't anything I'm new to. I know what I like and what appeals to me, and no amount of pushing on ANYONE'S part is going to change my mind.;)
Yeah, who you trying to convince, us or yourself? You won't change our minds either so your comments are futile and you are doing nothing but troll here. It's called the opinion, other people besides you are allowed to have one, yours isn't absolute and nor is mine... so whats the point in posting here for you since you obviously have no interest in this subject?

Guess what, we don't care if you don't like the wiimote, we never did, stop fooling yourself into thinking any of us give a crap about what you do, do what you like; You're getting these responces because most of the people who are posting here like this technology - just as you'd respond in kind if someone said something you don't like in a sony thread. Just to level the playing field, I know you don't give a shit about what I do either; That's pretty much a fact of life, unless you're famous nobody cares.
 
Last edited:

Allnatural

New member
Moderator
Frankly, I see a fundamental flaw in the Wiimote when it comes to FPS. Moving the controller doesn't move the view, only the reticle. In order to change the view, you have to move the reticle to the edge of the screen and "drag" the view with it (think Goldeneye's R button aiming mode). There's nothing inherently wrong with the tech; its design simply necessitates this behavior. It's perfect for on-rails shooters (Rez sequel please, kthx) but in traditional FPS the analog stick is superior, and the mouse even more so.
 

Miretank

Lurking
Doomulation said:
Yes, because you're a Sony fanboy and love everything they do.
As much as you do with Nintendo. I BET if Wii would read DVD and PS3 not, you'd bash PS3 because of that.

It's clearer an ego war. Pretty normal IMO.

Not even defending generalplot, just saying what I see.

To ScottJC: You're a self-declared Wii fanboy. You'll defend your shore as much as Plot defend theirs. So stop to try showing maturity when don't even reply friendly PMs for discussion. ;)
 

Top