What's new

New World Trade Center

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
Ok, that means that we should also ban any type of flight whatsoever, because its foolish under the same respect.

Don't evade the question a third time, answer it please.
 

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
Interesting. So where do you picture humanity being ten thousand years from now? Exactly where we are now, with no technological improvements? Because under your logic, thats exactly what should happen.
 

2fast4u

New member
nah, in all honesty i wouldnt go that far. not building extremely high skyscapers certainly does not mean not going with technology in general and i doubt you would think that of me either ...

sorry dude, but you are better than this.
 
The fact that its the largest is almost irrelevant, its what is to be done around it thats impressive. I think the whole ground zero redevlopment is tasteful, irrespective of the height of the tower they are building.

2fast: being under a captilist regeime means i live the life i do, not the life the people who live under dictators do... of course i'm a fan, and until someone convinces me otherwise I don't see i need for it to change
 

2fast4u

New member
The fact that its the largest is almost irrelevant, its what is to be done around it thats impressive. I think the whole ground zero redevlopment is tasteful, irrespective of the height of the tower they are building.

told ya its all taste, can we all have a beer together now and be friendly? ;)

2fast: being under a captilist regeime means i live the life i do, not the life the people who live under dictators do... of course i'm a fan, and until someone convinces me otherwise I don't see i need for it to change

lets not get into that one here even tho id have a few words about that too. long live democracy and long live the homeland security department.
 

Macca

New member
hehe..its not even gonna be the biggest building, there is a 460m building being built somewhere, i just read it in the paper, i would give you a location but really who gives a fuck :)
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
Yes we have freedom unlike you 2fast4u....we can decide if we want to go to war or not.....:cry:

Well we can watch it on tv!:happy:
 

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
2fast4u said:
nah, in all honesty i wouldnt go that far. not building extremely high skyscapers certainly does not mean not going with technology in general and i doubt you would think that of me either ...

Well, normaly I probably wouldn't, but it sounds like you are willing to halt anything in the name of personal safety, which is extremely counterproductive. Imagine if after the first failed apollo mission, we decided to discontinue the space program indefinitely. What you are suggesting is exactly that.

Maybe thats how every other country in the world works, I honestly don't know. All I know, is that america does not give up on anything. It never has, and it never will. That is why we are so successful. Now, skyscrapers serve a purpose, they provide several advantages over spreading several smaller buildings. Now, maybe your logic is to settle for less, at the expense of advancement, because you are worried about physical risk, but thats not how we work. We move forward in spite of any danger. Apollo 1 burned, so we made Apollo 2. The origional twin towers weren't designed to take a hit from a 757, but we do have both the technology and the ability to make it so. To add to that, airport security has increased massively since 9/11. So, again, why shouldn't we?
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
AlphaWolf said:
. All I know, is that america does not give up on anything. It never has, and it never will.

Apart from the puppet governments installed in the past, but thats another story:getlost:

Airport security now thats amusing, 30 minutes into the flight they bring you a fucking knife!
 

Hacktarux

Emulator Developer
Moderator
AlphaWolf: US can really build has much tower as they want, nobody cares. But we can still be surprised by this right ? it's not against USA is it ???

All i can say is that i wouldn't like seeing such thing being built in my own city coz i consider it as total waste of money and i wouldn't like to pay for it... Considering US has still around 13% of people below the poverty line, maybe they can build smaller towers and help them.... Now, such stupidity isn't exclusive to USA don't worry, chinese are also building a similar project...
 
OP
t0rek

t0rek

Wilson's Friend
WTF guys!!! :doh: I just posted this because this new WTC design looks innovative and cool, no matter if this fucking group of buildings are going to be constructed on USA or Europe (or in San Jose, Costa Rica LOL :happy: ) you have to admit it, that design is somehow modern, now I want you to know that I'm totaly desagree if USA atacks Irak ( I must say that) but this is not the topic, and I return here and I see this thread of the new WTC turned out into a War topic.
On 9-11 a big city lost some buildings, why don't let them construct some new ones if they want? that's the point, now if you wanna still discussing about war and Irak...
 

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
Hacktarux said:
AlphaWolf: US can really build has much tower as they want, nobody cares. But we can still be surprised by this right ? it's not against USA is it ???

Well, it's one thing to say "damn, another building going up", and another thing to say "stupid americans need to build small buildings because they just get blown up". Yeah, I know those aren't the exact words, but thats where its leading.


All i can say is that i wouldn't like seeing such thing being built in my own city coz i consider it as total waste of money and i wouldn't like to pay for it... Considering US has still around 13% of people below the poverty line, maybe they can build smaller towers and help them.... Now, such stupidity isn't exclusive to USA don't worry, chinese are also building a similar project...

WTC was the home of countless businesses, aka jobs, as the next building will be. It's not as if the lack of having a WTC doesn't have any adverse effect on the economy.

Oh, and BTW, our federal government does not pay anything for these buildings to be built.
 
Last edited:

2fast4u

New member
Best Angel, calm down. there is nothing wrong with this discussion.

Well, it's one thing to say "damn, another building going up", and another thing to say "stupid americans need to build small buildings because they just get blown up". Yeah, I know those aren't the exact words, but thats where its leading.

either way you are trying to play the innocent victim that gets bashed for no reason or what?
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
AlphaWolf said:
Well, it's one thing to say "damn, another building going up", and another thing to say "stupid americans need to build small buildings because they just get blown up". Yeah, I know those aren't the exact words, but thats where its leading.

Well in your little world it is, but we were not implying that in anyway :rolleyes:

Do you have a tin foil beanie hat?
 

Tri-Force

Philosopher Warrior
all you guys keep saying that buildign a tall building is stupid because it's just gonna get hit again. but you fail to remember that the Pentagon , that SHORT SHORT BUILDING IN COMPARISON TO MOST, also got hit with a plane. so (to quote every lying female) size doesn't matter. so build it high or build it low. if someone wants to bomb it they will bomb it no matter the height.
 
Last edited:

2fast4u

New member
the point is not the risk of being bombed, its the problem that evacuating a tall building like the wtc in a few minutes is extremely difficult how we all had to find out a damn hard way.
 

Top