AlphaWolf said:Again, theres a difference between being a terrorist and being anti-american. The majority of the french are anti-american for example, yet they aren't terrorists. And so far as dismissing what you say, I can't see anything concrete against building a new WTC other than anti-american sentiment. You claim money reasons, yet I fail to see any reasoning behind that. You also claim safety reasons, and I only see cowardess behind that, if not simple anti-americanism.
In other words, you have not given any valid reason of why not to build a new WTC, the only logical conclusion is that you don't want to see it built because of your anti-american sentiment.
AlphaWolf said:What actions in building the WTC could you possibly be concerned with, besides anti-american sentiment? e.g. what valid reason do you have to protest building the WTC? We already have plenty of reasons for building it, your argument that there is just no point is...well....moot.
Whats wrong with spending what we earn on ourselves anyways? We are not communist, we have the right to enjoy the fruits of our labor.
I have already said I dont see a point in tall buildings like that so why bother
aprentice said:Hey, as long as this isnt comming out of my paycheck like the cleanup did, and no budget cuts are needed to build this, im for it, otherwise they can suck my.. =p
Tri-Force said:you cant fit as many offices in a flat building as you can in a tall building. it's just common sense. they're using the limited space they have to create the maximum amount of jobs.
sytaylor said:
This is the best thing about Americans not the worst. The spirit to not to do something because it is easy, but because it is hard, and building something will be enjoyed by millions should not be criticised.
sytaylor said:The fact that its the largest is almost irrelevant, its what is to be done around it thats impressive. I think the whole ground zero redevlopment is tasteful, irrespective of the height of the tower they are building.
AlphaWolf said:Now, skyscrapers serve a purpose, they provide several advantages over spreading several smaller buildings.
AlphaWolf said:
WTC was the home of countless businesses, aka jobs, as the next building will be. It's not as if the lack of having a WTC doesn't have any adverse effect on the economy.
Oh, and BTW, our federal government does not pay anything for these buildings to be built.
AlphaWolf said:The majority of the french are anti-american for example, yet they aren't terrorists.
vampireuk said:Yes I do, its called a opinion if it was any other country I would say the exact same thing you smeg head![]()
vampireuk said:It's sad when a country thinks its more important than any other....especially when they make that judgement on the state of its military
What happens if the new one gets built and destroyed then, build another? After the first attack I would have thought some common sense would have been used but hell its your money to waste![]()
2fast4u said:nice try. better luck next time ..
AlphaWolf said:Alrighty then...
Wait a second...can somebody tell me whats wrong with this?
Wait, so you're saying they are terrorists?![]()
vampireuk said:I said that because many of the americans I know think they are superior because of their military strength, sound familiar alpha....many of them that you know?:baaa:
vampireuk said:It's sad when a country thinks its more important than any other.
...especially when they make that judgement on the state of its military
Well, Ostankino TV tower in Moscow is about 560m and world's tallest building is Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. There's a plans for 2km building but IMO it's waste of money.Macca said:hehe..its not even gonna be the biggest building, there is a 460m building being built somewhere, i just read it in the paper, i would give you a location but really who gives a fuck![]()