horrible frame rate and performance on my computer!!!
- Thread starter mak2k
- Start date
EdgeBlade
Brandonn
B*A*G*G said:
Anything can lay waste to the P4, that cut out all of the good stuff just to get it released eairly. And the Celerons are just other Processers like the P3 with a few feactures removed and bus speed lowerd so they can be sold at a resonable price.
MHz don't mean eveything. If a chip dosen't have all the goodies that a program needs then it's gonna have more thing it needs to compute and therefore won't be able to run at it's full speed as well as a chip with all the goodies can. I believe AMD is at the top of the mountain here and if/when I can upgrade I'm gonna go that route.
Their for the intels too
and they if you have ever tried installing the 'very' unstable 23.11 drivers you will know that they have problems with the VIA based motherboards, and the VIA drivers improve IDE performance for any VIA based motherboard regardless of the cpu being amd or intel -nt- 0wned
and they if you have ever tried installing the 'very' unstable 23.11 drivers you will know that they have problems with the VIA based motherboards, and the VIA drivers improve IDE performance for any VIA based motherboard regardless of the cpu being amd or intel -nt- 0wned
Re: Their for the intels too
To my knowledge, there's no such thing as a VIA
chipset for an Intel processor. Like I said, he is trying
to install VIA drivers to his Intel chipset motherboard
and it won't work since VIA chipsets support ONLY AMD.
If you know of any VIA chipset motherboard that supports
an Intel processor, feel free to give us the manufacturer
and name of the board.
I couldn't find one.
Thanks.
Triz said:
To my knowledge, there's no such thing as a VIA
chipset for an Intel processor. Like I said, he is trying
to install VIA drivers to his Intel chipset motherboard
and it won't work since VIA chipsets support ONLY AMD.
If you know of any VIA chipset motherboard that supports
an Intel processor, feel free to give us the manufacturer
and name of the board.
I couldn't find one.
Thanks.
lmao
lol rrevved you stupid fuck (no offense)
my m/board is VIA and i have a P3 cpu so erm u obviously don't know what you're talking about, www.0wned.com heh
lol rrevved you stupid fuck (no offense)
my m/board is VIA and i have a P3 cpu so erm u obviously don't know what you're talking about, www.0wned.com hehdiamond gezzer
New member
Mate ur problem is either the compatibility with win2k, or you are asking too much from ur graphics card, what resolution are u playing at? What colour 16-32? Which options do you have enabled.
I have a pentium 4 1.7, with 256meg and a geforce 2 mx400, i thought my comp could handle andything and turned on all the options that made the game look sweet, but the comp couldnt handle it and the framerate was crap. So I went back and made everything defualts and the resolution to 1024-768, 32 bit, and all games run fine and 50-60fps.
I have a pentium 4 1.7, with 256meg and a geforce 2 mx400, i thought my comp could handle andything and turned on all the options that made the game look sweet, but the comp couldnt handle it and the framerate was crap. So I went back and made everything defualts and the resolution to 1024-768, 32 bit, and all games run fine and 50-60fps.
little_dogus1
whos yo daddy
help
geometry transforms should not be automatic, and correct me if im wrong, but win200 is bad for pj64
geometry transforms should not be automatic, and correct me if im wrong, but win200 is bad for pj64
