0z0n said:I can tell, that in GeForce 4 MX there is no also half of that is in GeForce 3. And in general GeForce 3 on many parameters it is better, than GeForce 4MX.
Well if to take a videocard on base GF 4, then Titanium version.
Martin said:The FX5200 is a piece of junk. Even the FX5200 Ultra which I had a while was a piece of junk. I'd get a Radeon 9600 Pro instead.
Ah, I wasn't aware the price difference was so big. Regardless, his current GF4 MX is actually not much slower than the 5200 so the upgrade would be pointless, except that he would get a DX9 card, which again is pointless since the card is too slow to take advantage of it.khanmeister said:Well, yeah, but you're talking about an extra hundie for that bad boy! Or $80 is the closest price point i could find.
*sigh*
But yes, /me wants a 9600 pro also.
www.pricewatch.com has one for $124
khanmeister said:A cheap fx5200 will likely give you better performance and newer features for most things, and are comparable in price.
That's what I'd do!