Not at all - its only with SSE2 usage. In total performance my CPU is beating yours Celeron.I actually beat you in the FPU multimedia bench.
Ok,Ok - mine is 2.8Gb...I'd bet my ass you won't beat my mem bench scores.. 3.8GB/s raw bandwidth.
cooliscool said:Where's your memory benchmark scores? I didn't see them at ngemu.. but the ones you did post.. there's little difference in our scores. I actually beat you in the FPU multimedia bench. :evil:
I'd bet my ass you won't beat my mem bench scores.. 3.8GB/s raw bandwidth.![]()
abba said:my system
intel orignal 4.0 ghz (HT)
4GB of ram
nivida geforce 2 400 MX , geforce 6 6600,ati 98k
segate barcuda 120gb 72 rpm,westen digital 120 gb
samsung 52x cd/sony dvd rom/LG cd rw
still chanka run some games a little slow
What the hell are you talking about? My CPU a bit faster than Celeron 3.45Hgz and 100% faster than Barton at 11x200And actually if Strange's computer is set up correctly, his 12x200 > 2.8ghz celeron @ 3.3ghz
Strange said:2 Jigga0o7
What the hell are you talking about? My CPU a bit faster than Celeron 3.45Hgz and 100% faster than Barton at 11x200![]()
Really good joke. Myabe you should try to look at my Sandra results first before saying such a nonesense? 2200MhzVs2400Mhz and 2200Mhz is faster just because of bigger L2 cashe?And actually 12x200 tbred = 11x200 barton.
abba said:segate barcuda 120gb 72 rpm
Shakey_Jake3 said:Specs are in my sig...
Soul Calibur - 15-25fps (In battle)