james.miller
HELL YES. IT'S ME!
Rzeractor said:i have a GF2 mx400, i just realised i put 420...
oops
but, on that graph, look at the difference with high detail
for the first cpu, the Ti is way above the Mx
considering that, I will get quite a bit performance increase if I get a GF4 Ti 4200
look at the text i posted from the site. then look at the graph. that graph STARTS with an athlon 800 and goes up from there.
your cpu isnt even concidered because its TOO SLOW
lets put it another way. look at that graph.
if that graph went as low as you're cpu, the two would be damn near identical.
i've allready told you that my xp1800 (running at xp2000 speed) with 512mb ddr cant even keep up with my gf4 440mx when it comes to emulating.
do you really expect your pIII-600 with 128mb SDRAM to keep up with a ti4200?????? theres no way in hell.
im telling you now - that is not a wise investment.