vampireuk
Mr. Super Clever
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3613072.stm
They should hang this traitor from the nearest tree
They should hang this traitor from the nearest tree
US traitor goes on trial
- Thread starter vampireuk
- Start date
olivieryuyu
New member
vampireuk said:
i'm against death penalty but well this guy deserves to be punish by beeing jailed for the rest of his life if he's guilty.
olivieryuyu
New member
vampireuk said:
hmm you are for death penalty ? why ? it's not because there is death penalty that there is less crime ... So what's the aim of the death penalty ? Being as barbarian as the criminals ? What is the difference between the criminals and honest citizens if we act as criminals, i mean killing people ?
Last edited:
OP
vampireuk
Mr. Super Clever
- Thread Starter
- #11
Treason is one of the most disgusting crimes there is, the man went behind his fellow soldiers and tried to give military information to the enemy. At least I can sleep well knowing he will get the shit kicked out of him when he goes to a military jail.
disgusting, dispicable, underhanded, and downright wrong. Yes, it is. But barbaric crimes (better known as violent crimes), there has to be some sort of crime against another individual directly. Murder, manslaughter, battery, and arson ... these are violent crimes. Better defined as crimes with the intent to cause damage. Rape is a disputed crime, it doesnt fit the definition because its intent is for a sick twisted pleasure, but not intent to cause damage. Treason is comitting a crime against the interests of a nation, not against a person and not with an intent to cause damage. Its as much barbaric as theft, larsony or embezzelment. Its a non-violent crime.
Last edited:
GbaGuy
New member
If I was president, he would have been shot by now. A proper military
shouldn't put up with that sort of thing. Bring it before the president,
show the evidence, and if it's obviously true, just shoot him. Simple as
that for a soldier. You would think dishonor of committing treason would
be enough, but sometimes you just gotta shoot them.
If he were a civillian (2 L's?) spying, I might be more lenient, but then
again, spy's caught out of uniform (of the enemy) are traditionally killed...
EDIT: well... actually, if I were president, I'd shoot his commanding officer
too, for not shooting the guy in the first place.. maybe...
shouldn't put up with that sort of thing. Bring it before the president,
show the evidence, and if it's obviously true, just shoot him. Simple as
that for a soldier. You would think dishonor of committing treason would
be enough, but sometimes you just gotta shoot them.
If he were a civillian (2 L's?) spying, I might be more lenient, but then
again, spy's caught out of uniform (of the enemy) are traditionally killed...
EDIT: well... actually, if I were president, I'd shoot his commanding officer
too, for not shooting the guy in the first place.. maybe...
sir_key
Banned
i think he's innocent... i mean hey al-quaeda chatrooms?? that sounds fecking ridiculous... like going to google and looking for those chatrooms... alo what language did they speak in those rooms? english... well... i've heard that the u.s. is going trough emails with filters wich look after keywords... well if that guy didn't use keywords how can they proove that the e-mails they use as "evidence" are real? i dunno but i don't think those al-quaeda guys are that dumb... just my two cents...
olivieryuyu
New member
DuDe said:
Justice and Revenge is not the same thing ...