B*A*G*G said:
hmmm i think id rather have a Zelda looking game with FF gameplay. that would be righteous bro
WRONG.
FF has no actual game play, its only management. Management of inventory and stats, and Management of Party during battles. Zelda on the other hand, had always had gameplay.
Just compare boss battles.
Zelda: consist of shooting here, dodging that, bombing here, block that, slash like mad, repeat.
FF: cast very damaging spells, attack, attack, wait, wait, wait(theres moments where no one does anything), take massive damage, heal if needed, repeat.
On the other hand, Square always had great graphics (please note the beautiful prerendered scenery). although, Zelda OoT did have great effects, it cannot compare to the many works of art that is the FF backgrounds.
so if i had a choice, I'd take Zelda gameplay, and square in charge of all art.