Purty colors
- Thread starter Allnatural
- Start date
Actually it was the 9600 Pro used in the benchmarks. And the one that shoes the 9600 Pro being so much better than everything else was the "best frame rate for the dollar" test.
I'm not saying that it's not good, but bluntly saying it's totally better than the 5900 Ultra 256 is quite unfounded. It may be, but other be a quality card, there is no other test pitting the 9600 Pro against anything else.
I'm not saying that it's not good, but bluntly saying it's totally better than the 5900 Ultra 256 is quite unfounded. It may be, but other be a quality card, there is no other test pitting the 9600 Pro against anything else.
pandamoan
Banned
vampireuk said:
actually, you n00bs, the current ati generation is TROUNCING everything by nvidia, across the board, and not just in the price/performance catagory.
let's face it, nvidia has lost contracts in many important areas, because they shirked R&D to do some overheated leafblower thing.
i'm not a fan of either company, based on their track records, but currently the ati chips/cards are superior, and a smarter buy, almost regardless of that superiority.
and nvidia was recently caught CHEATING on benchmarks, which is an obvious act of corporate desperation, while ati leaked doom 3, so they could point out ANOTHER reason their technology is superior.
maybe after this fx crap dies, nvidia will have a new product line to compete, until then, sorry nvidia fans....
not that any of this is relevant when the best card for n64 emulation is glide compatible... LOL
jamie
Tagrineth
Dragony thingy
Lex said:
Wrong.
The only other Pixel Shaders 2.0-heavy game, Tomb Raider: AOD, tends to be about 2.5x faster on Radeons than on GFFX's with equal game settings. Only when you use "Recommended" settings (i.e. lower settings a lot for GFFX line, even turning PS2.0 off for the 5200) is the FX line comparable.
OP
- Thread Starter
- #26
Blah, blah, blah. I should never have started this thread; I should have known it would turn into a "my card is better than your card" pissing contest.
None of it matters now. I have my new card and I'm happy, and when I'm happy the world is happy.
Right? :blink:
None of it matters now. I have my new card and I'm happy, and when I'm happy the world is happy.
Right? :blink:
AlphaWolf
I prey, not pray.
Tagrineth said:
Sorry, but you lost all of your credibility when you said that FSAA doesn't blur graphics on Radeon cards :happy:
AlphaWolf
I prey, not pray.
Allnatural said:
They are lieing, the little glitches are still there, just these guys probably have never owned an nvidia card so they think those glitches are "normal"
. When I bought my radeon, those glitches appeared plain as day. Thing is though, this card offers me far to many advantages for a laptop that make switching to any geforce not worth it. If I had a desktop system, I would think very hard before getting a radeon (but I wouldn't necessarily refuse to get one either).If you ask me, I think both of these companies suck. What we need is a third vendor to step in and set a new standard.
Last edited: