What's new

Nuclear War?! Right now?

Slougi said:
It's not about making a few greenpeace representatives happy, it's about saving the planet......

im sorry but CO2 is not gonna kill the planet in the next 10 years, nevermind the next 100 years... hell we're coming out of an ice age... when we come out of ice ages the planet gets warmer and CO2 emitions go up, thought u environmentalists would know that, or would you rather just blame a head figure who doesnt do what you want? i mean cmon... before we entered the last ice age there are fossils that show britain had tropical forrests!!!!
 

2fast4u

New member
sytaylor said:


im sick of people saying that, god damnit, did you not notice 6000 people who were at work loose their lives? and you condemn the acton to prevent this... who moral it is i don't care, if you can stop that happening again you have my support, especially if youre not sending 75 cruise missles in the middle of nowhere in the hope of stopping bin laden and you dont kill one member of the al queada (*cough* clinton *cough*)

sy, stop the fuck about the cruise missles, we all know that clinton did that but --- THATS NO EXCUSE FOR BUSH TO EVEN OR WORSE! u got that?? if i would say the earth's history has always been fucked up, so why try to change it is the same thing! this is just plain bullshit!
 

2fast4u

New member
sytaylor said:


i dont doubt that, howveer i do doubt the idea that bush will use nukes, hell people thought the usa and or russia were gonna send a nuke any day for about 20 years, and they never did... war is as much about polotics and money than it is violence, if not more

jesus, read cold war history again. u probably have no idea how close they were to send away those missles. berlin, 1954 -- cuba, 1961 -- berlin / the wall, 1969 -- only to name a few. u probably totally underestimate the power of nuclear weapons as well. newest nuclear weapons make hiroshima look like a firecracker, just u know.
 

2fast4u

New member
sytaylor said:


im sorry but CO2 is not gonna kill the planet in the next 10 years, nevermind the next 100 years... hell we're coming out of an ice age... when we come out of ice ages the planet gets warmer and CO2 emitions go up, thought u environmentalists would know that, or would you rather just blame a head figure who doesnt do what you want? i mean cmon... before we entered the last ice age there are fossils that show britain had tropical forrests!!!!

ur point?
 
my point about the cruise missles was that what bush isnt doing isnt telling bin laden to talk to the hand cos the face aint listening, he's doing something about it... and are you gonna accept that nasty things happen on this planet or what?

as for your second point, you seriously think the cold war was NOT about polotics and money? then im afriad you are misguided, true they came close to sending missiles, possibly very close... and for the record assuming underestimation simply for disagreement is a grave misjudgement.

my point about co2 is pretty damn obvious, wheres the sense in crippling yourself to make little or no difference to a changing environment:blush:
 

Remote

Active member
Moderator
sytaylor said:
my point about the cruise missles was that what bush isnt doing isnt telling bin laden to talk to the hand cos the face aint listening, he's doing something about it... and are you gonna accept that nasty things happen on this planet or what?

as for your second point, you seriously think the cold war was NOT about polotics and money? then im afriad you are misguided, true they came close to sending missiles, possibly very close... and for the record assuming underestimation simply for disagreement is a grave misjudgement.

my point about co2 is pretty damn obvious, wheres the sense in crippling yourself to make little or no difference to a changing environment:blush:

Exactly, there are no real proof that mankind is the reason for the global heating, perhaps we are increasing it by a very, very small percentage... Also, a or the reason for why they still are bombing Afganistan is oil. Russia wants to draw pipelines through the Aganistan desert to avoid problems with other countries in the nearby area... By looking on a map I am sure you are able to find out which countries I am refering to...
 

Derek

less evil admin ;)
"I don't know how long this has been going on, but just a few days ago i heard about how many countries America has been threatening that are considered at threat to the America, Anyone know what I am talking about?"

"yup, bush has treatened china, north corea, iraq, etc. to use nuclear warfare against them. holy shit, i feel a controversial topic coming up but this is absolutely INCREDIBLE !! it shows that the usa is willing to use any way possible if it helps its goals. the problem is that in a nuclear war, there are no winners - believe me here (u too, sy! ). if this wont be stopped we have stepped nearer to the end of the world as we know it."

wow, the false information here is amazing. he never threatened to use it, it's just been revealed that there are contingency plans laid out in case something escalates to the point where they have to use it. countries prepare for this kind of thing all the times, that doesn't mean they plan to, want to, or think they will use it. that just means if the worse case scenario comes up, they are prepared.

and you can be sure, russia, china, et al have laid out strategic plans as well.

nobody was threatened.
 

Jakob

evil *******
This thread is yet more proof that emutalk is a mental wasteland. I have nothing more to say about it.
 
dabods said:
wow, the false information here is amazing. he never threatened to use it, it's just been revealed that there are contingency plans laid out in case something escalates to the point where they have to use it. countries prepare for this kind of thing all the times, that doesn't mean they plan to, want to, or think they will use it. that just means if the worse case scenario comes up, they are prepared.

and you can be sure, russia, china, et al have laid out strategic plans as well.

nobody was threatened.

and thus we see some sense :) see people hit the panick button and blame the guy in charge the whole time... bleh
 

2fast4u

New member
wow, the false information here is amazing. he never threatened to use it, it's just been revealed that there are contingency plans laid out in case something escalates to the point where they have to use it. countries prepare for this kind of thing all the times, that doesn't mean they plan to, want to, or think they will use it. that just means if the worse case scenario comes up, they are prepared.

...which practically says wot i posted.
 

2fast4u

New member
i like this thinking that some ppl here think, global warming will strike anyway, so we might as well make it worse. but this thread is again losing its focus, the topic was nuclear war...:blush:
 

Derek

less evil admin ;)
"...which practically says wot i posted."

actually you posted:
"bush has treatened to bomb these countries with nuclear weapons. do i need to say more? congress has approved every instance of this imperialistic war and plus he doesnt even need the approval anymore since he is already granted all powers. "

once again, need i say it one more time that he never threatened to use them?

and actually, the president cannot declare war. and the use of nuclear weapons would certainly be a step from a 'conflict' (re: vietnam) to declaring war.
 

2fast4u

New member
dabods said:

once again, need i say it one more time that he never threatened to use them?

once again, do i need to say that this more or less means he would use them? please, i am sick of splitting hair.
 
OP
Josep

Josep

eyerun4phun
ME=ENRAGED, ok i didn't think this thread would keep going, and thankfull it did and you guys have followed through with not recognizing any problems by reading that story Azimer found;)


Sounds like a pollution control agreement to limit climate change from pollution. We definately wouldn't need to worry about this if we had nukes dropped on us.

Sounds LIKE!? JEez...

It has nothing to do with th current nuke bomb storry...

hehe, wow, you guys are that dense

it was the koyoto agreement which was essentially a set of sanctions that would financially cripple the usa

well it looks like sy has feel into the lovely propoganda that the usa wants us to believe;)

my point about co2 is pretty damn obvious, wheres the sense in crippling yourself to make little or no difference to a changing environment

EXACTLY! You guys DON'T know anything about the environmental crisis, you read one little story from Azimer cause you really had no idea what i was talking about, and you guys obviously have no backaround information on environmental pollution today;)

Crippling YOUR NATION?! CUTTING back 500 million(might have been billion) From the E.P.A., WHERE DO YOU THINK THAT IS GOING? CRIPPLING YOUR NATION FOR MORE WAR in denying the kyoto protocol, and greedy little bush admin. with big businesses

Why do you think over 2,500 scientist in Kyoto, Japan agreed that C02 emissions from America alone is destroying our environmental protection? Not to mention the 1,000's of American scientists that believe this as well, YOU KNOW WHAT SCIENTISTS didn't agree on this?! The big oil companies and and automobile companie's Scientists, YES and all of you conforming leads these big businesses into depleting this non-renewable resources (not renewable within our liftime) AND not to mention covering up the crisis with our ozone and the greenhouse effect, none of you believe in this and thats EXACTLY what big businesses and the Bush Admin. want you to believe, they profit temporarily, we suffer enivronmental damages, you guys wanna here the statistics of how screwed we are? cause i know you all don't know, wait for Azimer to post another story so you all can just base it off one source.
 

Derek

less evil admin ;)
"once again, do i need to say that this more or less means he would use them? please, i am sick of splitting hair."

no, not at all. it means he is <b>PREPARED</B> to use them. not that he would. when you are the president of a country, with enemies across the world, who you know are currently <b>producing</b> weapons of mass destruction, it would be assinine not to have a plan on what course of action you should take if things escalate to that point.

maybe you're ignorant, i dunno. but you can't seem to grasp the point.
 

2fast4u

New member
i thank josep for this. excellent points, dude.:thumbsup: too bad this has all been said already but these ppl dont get it. :innocent:
 
OP
Josep

Josep

eyerun4phun
i haven't been able to keep up dammit;) i was basing most of that stuff from the last page
 

Top