Linux port for 1964?

[ySS]

W0w!!
I did never noticed that 1964 is an Open Source Project... well, my question, is there any Linux port of 1964?

Thanks!

 

[vleespet]

Nope, there isn't.

 

[ultima528]

i thought one of the linux emulators (mupen i believe) is based on the 1964 source code... i could be wrong though :satisfied

 

[vleespet]

You're confusing Mupen with Sixtyforce. Sixtyforce is based on the 1964 source code is has been ported to the mac.

 

[ultima528]

lol must be

 

[karth95]

yeah, I don't think it's going to be ported unless someone other than schibo and rice do it.

 

[ySS]

I'm actually using 1964 0.8.5 (i've haven't tried 0.9.9 yet) with Winex3 3.2 and it works fine, but it's always better run a native compiled thing.

Thanks, i'll make a research for Sixtyforce.

 

[ultima528]

I'm actually using 1964 0.8.5 (i've haven't tried 0.9.9 yet) with Winex3 3.2 and it works fine, but it's always better run a native compiled thing.

Thanks, i'll make a research for Sixtyforce.

I just wanted to point out that that isn't always necessarily true. I think I heard that ePSXe windows runs better on Linux (with wine) than the native Linux port of it.

Also, about Sixtyforce, just so you know, it's a Mac emulator, not Linux. I got confused before.

 

[ySS]

Oh no, the confusion was my fault, thanks anyway.

About epsxe... i don't know if windows versions would run better than linux one under linux, but i'll tell you a secret: The linux version under linux runs MUCH MORE SMOOTHER tna windows version running in windows. It's Ok with it.