What's new

Colin Powell speech

2fast4u

New member
I don't believe I have made personal comments to anybody and will continue not to do so.

hey, you just insulted a whole group of 85 million people ... nothing with that, eh? oh, i sense hippocricy
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
so its a historical fact that germans have fun gassing people and the french smell of garlic?

And all those "names" were pretty well justified since you started saying "if they want some they can have it too"

Remember kid you are been watched very carefully now.
 

Slougi

New member
DeadRabbit said:
Ok,

Ignoramous, "listen up boy", and "Omg, are you really that stupid", these are a list of names and quotes that have been said about me so far in this conversation.

I don't believe I have made personal comments to anybody and will continue not to do so.

Instead I will use historical facts, and personal opinion to make my points.

And no, I think you will find that I am "not" in the minority because I think it is terrible that he gassed his own people.

Well, I'd be shocked if I was.

I wonder what would shock people into acting nowadays then ?
In fact you have made personal comments. Not direct personal comments, but comments stating or impliying that other nations are inferior to England and/or the USA. I could counter all your facts with facts that are equally damning. But what is the point?
I agree, it is terrible that he gassed his own people. But the USA will do no good by acts of war. Much more good would be done by lifting the sanctions and including Iraq in the world economy, on condition that the country be democratically lead from then on. Or something similar to this.
 

Trotterwatch

Active member
Much more good would be done by lifting the sanctions and including Iraq in the world economy, on condition that the country be democratically lead from then on. Or something similar to this.

Totally agree, we have to do something to stop the Middle Eastern countries from hating us so much, and hatred causes fanatacism (and we all know where that leads eventually).
 

Slougi

New member
Trotterwatch said:
Totally agree, we have to do something to stop the Middle Eastern countries from hating us so much, and hatred causes fanatacism (and we all know where that leads eventually).
True. Actually Europe is generally not hated, I know that by first hand experience. (I am an Arab after all :))
The two countries really hated in the middle east are the USA and Israel. Israel we all know why, and America because they basically provide Israel with free weapons, equipment and lots of funding.
 

DeadRabbit

Emutalk Janitor
Ok,

We've come to a point where you will find I am 100% in agreement with you.

Yes, sanctions are absolutely pointless and do only harm innocents, as anybody involved and I mean "properly" involved with Saddam will have the means to bypass any effect they may have.

But, unfortunately no, I really do think that war is the only answer. In fact had this been decided many years ago then we probably woldn't be in the state of affairs that we are in today, where there is worry about his possible nuclear arsenal.

And also, yes I do think that what I saw on the television was more than enough reason.

Let's (with regret I'm sure) return to my point about the holocaust. I'm sure everyone agrees that it was probably the worst aspect of WW2. If this is so, then how is what Saddam has done any different. Why does he get some kind of leniancy over this issue ?

People are incredibly good at talking about how evil people are, and how righteous they are themselves, but unfortunately as history has proved, they are extraordinarily lethargic when it comes to backing their good words with deeds.
 

2fast4u

New member
But, unfortunately no, I really do think that war is the only answer. In fact had this been decided many years ago then we probably woldn't be in the state of affairs that we are in today, where there is worry about his possible nuclear arsenal.

lets also not forget the oil thingie im not willing to repeat at this point. imo the weapons are just the reason they want us to believe to make it look legitimate.
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
War is not the last option though, if you have heard about the latest proposal by France,Germany and Russia it should at least interest you.

Double the weapons inspectors and use spy planes all through Iraq airspace - this covers the weapons case

UN Peacekeepers in Iraq - These will protect the Iraqi people and help them recieve the aid that they should get and ends up with Saddam.

War is not the only option but the Bush administration is not even looking at this proposal which is really bugging me. They chose war over peace, what kind of goverment is that to have in the "free world".
 

Slougi

New member
DeadRabbit said:
Ok,

We've come to a point where you will find I am 100% in agreement with you.

Yes, sanctions are absolutely pointless and do only harm innocents, as anybody involved and I mean "properly" involved with Saddam will have the means to bypass any effect they may have.
Well, at least we agree here :)

But, unfortunately no, I really do think that war is the only answer. In fact had this been decided many years ago then we probably woldn't be in the state of affairs that we are in today, where there is worry about his possible nuclear arsenal.
It has been somewhat unavoidable ever since the original gulf war. Had the USA acted differently war could have been averted. It is now not possible anymore. The US would loose their face if they pulled out now; and they will not let that happen. However by fighting they will be despised as well. More good would come out of no war, in my opinion; but I do not see that happening anymore at this point. It is a lesson to be learnt and applied in the future. Unfortunately humans seem incapable of this...

And also, yes I do think that what I saw on the television was more than enough reason.

Let's (with regret I'm sure) return to my point about the holocaust. I'm sure everyone agrees that it was probably the worst aspect of WW2. If this is so, then how is what Saddam has done any different. Why does he get some kind of leniancy over this issue ?
He does not. The point is that a war would kill many innocent people too; at least as many as killed by Saddam Hussein. A peaceful solution should be pursued. It seems the current US administration lacks the political insight to do this though.

People are incredibly good at talking about how evil people are, and how righteous they are themselves, but unfortunately as history has proved, they are extraordinarily lethargic when it comes to backing their good words with deeds.
Quite true, quite true :)
 

Trotterwatch

Active member
What I would like? Double the number of inspectors, spyplanes, US Peacekeepers.... just like the Nato plan, but I also don't want Saddam to escape without anything happening. But what can happen to him, I doubt very much he would just consent to being tried for War Crimes.

I don't think anyone wishes any harm to the Iraqi people they are the ones suffering more than anyone - perhaps if we lift the sanctions then the people of Iraq can at least lead semi-proper lives.

The ultimate dream must be to have Iraq as a Democracy (or anything other than despotism), is that achievable? I for one hope so.
 
OP
AlphaWolf

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
2fast4u said:
spot the guy with the cristall ball :p show some proof before you make accusations like that

Yeah well - - - (sudden pause)

Wait a second, aren't the same baseless accusations being made in our direction?

Must the teapot call the kettle black?
 

Slougi

New member
AlphaWolf said:
Yeah well - - - (sudden pause)

Wait a second, aren't the same baseless accusations being made in our direction?

Must the teapot call the kettle black?
What accusations are you referring to specifically?
 
OP
AlphaWolf

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
Re: Re: Colin Powell speech

2fast4u said:
... they just want him to be gone so we can have ourselves a little oil well opening and our people can drive 500 meters to the grocery store again.

Trotterwatch said:
I doubt very much he would just consent to being tried for War Crimes.

Theres the Achielles heel of the ICC
 
Last edited:
OP
AlphaWolf

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
2fast4u said:
establish some context first, please. what baseless accusations?

Ok here it is a second time:

2fast4u said:
... they just want him to be gone so we can have ourselves a little oil well opening and our people can drive 500 meters to the grocery store again.

I will probably get more warning points for making the same argument again, but I realy don't care:

Now, the teapot calling the kettle black, is an old expression, has nothing to do with race. What I mean by this, is that you guys, who have a pretty dirty history I might add, constantly insist that the US is some evil rogue state bent on some evil motive.

You guys constantly make these baseless arguments that the US is after ulterior motives (e.g. oil). Making similar assumptions, its logical that we could assume that you're after the same thing, is it not? This is why you shouldn't assume too much, because you're making an ass out of u and me in this argument.

This is exactly why I made that statement to x2f4u earlier. This one will probably be edited too, but oh well, I said it.
 
Last edited:

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
AlphaWolf said:
Now, the teapot calling the kettle black, is an old expression, has nothing to do with race. What I mean by this, is that you guys, who have a pretty dirty history I might add, constantly insist that the US is some evil rogue state bent on some evil motive.

rofl I was joking

and stop been a little bitch about having your post edited. You know what you said was wrong so stop trying to play the innocent victim
 
OP
AlphaWolf

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
My comment was more wrong than say...you telling me all of that shit about the stars and stripes? especialy the bit about how you "wipe your ass with the stars and stripes"?

The stars and stripes mean a lot more to me and my peers than you can probably imagine, yet this is the first time I have griped about your comments, let alone had the desire to "gag" you.
 

vampireuk

Mr. Super Clever
There is a difference between talking foul of a goverment and talking foul of the people. You spoke foul of the people whereas I have never done. I'm no getting into this BS with you, stop whining and act like a man about it instead of crying about it every chance you get.
 
OP
AlphaWolf

AlphaWolf

I prey, not pray.
vampireuk said:
There is a difference between talking foul of a goverment and talking foul of the people. You spoke foul of the people whereas I have never done.

First consider how government and people relate, then re-read that statement a few times.


I'm no getting into this BS with you, stop whining and act like a man about it instead of crying about it every chance you get.

/me grins

I love the irony. Seriously! :happy:
 

Top