What's new

Deleted topic...

FlotsamX

New member
My topic on "No$GBA 2.6x" was deleted. With no explanation. Why?

1. It was NOT an illegal release of No$GBA, nor a leak, but an add-on for 2.6.

2. I did not link to any inappropriate site.

3. It is NOT a rehash of NDS2xgl: in tests against it, No$GBA 2.6x ran on average 1/3 faster. You can test the 2 yourself.

So?
 

smcd

Active member
And yet you posted it over at dcemu jkkdark? :p It does seem *very* similar to the nds2xgl utility though...
 

mudlord

Banned
My topic on "No$GBA 2.6x" was deleted. With no explanation. Why?

1. It was NOT an illegal release of No$GBA, nor a leak, but an add-on for 2.6.

2. I did not link to any inappropriate site.

3. It is NOT a rehash of NDS2xgl: in tests against it, No$GBA 2.6x ran on average 1/3 faster. You can test the 2 yourself.

1) Yet it was released by a shady character....
2) Well, you linked to the program, so...
3) Please give me benchmarks to PROVE it runs a third faster (which sounds ludicrous). I already gave evidence why this is a lame hack, and I'm not gonna repeat myself when its so obvious its a fraud.:matrix:
 

smcd

Active member
I ran it on my real pc and not a virtual pc image... haven't noticed anything yet so hopefully the person isn't *too* shady :p
 
OP
F

FlotsamX

New member
1) Yet it was released by a shady character....
2) Well, you linked to the program, so...
3) Please give me benchmarks to PROVE it runs a third faster (which sounds ludicrous). I already gave evidence why this is a lame hack, and I'm not gonna repeat myself when its so obvious its a fraud.:matrix:

To 1:

And? Just because he pirates doesn't mean he's COMPLETLY crazy.

2. Because this site has had a broken file uploader ever since I joined. And, what was so inappropriate about the site?

3. Of course you did. And then the topic was deleted, so I couldn't see it. And, I've tried both: not only does No$GBA 2.6x go faster (though I wouldn't be one to say 1/3rd like the guy I got it from did), but it also is more compatable. Ndsgl2x has compatability problems with Windows XP and Vista: No$GBA 2.6x does not, and THAT is from personal experience..

And yet again, WHY is it a fraud? Because it's similar to another, earlier existing program? I guess P64k is a fraud, then, even though it also happens to be the most popular online emulator.
 

mudlord

Banned
And? Just because he pirates doesn't mean he's COMPLETLY crazy.

But it brings the integrity of the person into question, now doesn't it? :matrix:

Of course you did. And then the topic was deleted, so I couldn't see it.

And yet again, WHY is it a fraud? Because it's similar to another, earlier existing program? I guess P64k is a fraud, then, even though it also happens to be the most popular online emulator.

How convenient. :matrix: Well lets go over things shall we?:

1) Exact same menu layout
2) Exact same nuances
3) Questionable means to conceal all this. Although a debugger makes short work of the "protection" on it. :matrix:

Thats more than enough to tell me its a VERY lame hack and fraud of Mysoft's app.

I guess P64k is a fraud, then, even though it also happens to be the most popular online emulator.

Now your just talking bullshit. :angry: Grow up. Its not a fraud because it adds things functionally different to the original executable. Such as Kaillera support.

The reason this app is one though, is because of the exact same behaviors as Mysoft's app. Not to mention the thing's discussed about. What your most likely experiencing is placebo. So I'd like to see proper benchmarks that prove otherwise.
 
OP
F

FlotsamX

New member
No need to cry over it, now. Even if it IS a fraud: okay. No need to get so defensive over it.
 

squall_leonhart

The Great Gunblade Wielder
Now your just talking bullshit. :angry: Grow up. Its not a fraud because it adds things functionally different to the original executable. Such as Kaillera support.

Correction,
Project64K isn't an illegal hack as the original source from 1.4 was used to make it.

This IS a hack because the functions were hacked into the executable.
 
OP
F

FlotsamX

New member
Oh yes there is.

Stealing other peoples work is bad. Trying to cover it up as thier own....now thats much worse....

Fine... reguarded, I STILL have not been explained to my satisfation on how this is illegal, but nonetheless.
 

revl8er

That Damn Good
It's just a rule of the board really. Most people who actually test these programs out and know anything about them can tell when a program has just been copied, and it usually just doesn't go well with them. I mean, how would you feel if you worked hard on something then have someone else come out with the same program and said they made it? I personally wouldn't like it too much, but that's me.
 

mudlord

Banned
Correction,
Project64K isn't an illegal hack as the original source from 1.4 was used to make it.

This IS a hack because the functions were hacked into the executable.

LOL, I know its not a illegal hack, because it used the original source. :p
 

Cyberman

Moderator
Moderator
Hmmm should this topic be closed? The question is answered and it seems to have gone astray in terms of conversation.
By the way FlotsamX we don't mind being asked questions, ussually, but do watch the attitude with which you ask them.

Cyb
 

Top