What's new

Not enough Memory for jump table, HELP ME!

squall_leonhart

The Great Gunblade Wielder
mate, i used to run PJ64 on 256mbs of memory. and it worked pefectly fine. its more likely either a corrupt pagefile or bad video drivers.
 

Doomulation

?????????????????????????
Once more, I repeat, I am not saying it it is the cause of the error. But it is disaster to run XP with such little RAM. It isn't designed for it and it never will be.
 

squall_leonhart

The Great Gunblade Wielder
THE REQUIRED MEMORY SIZE IS 256MB it says so on the box and on MS's site
it is designed to run on 128mb of ram without problems.


Windows XP Professional System Requirements

Published: August 24, 2001


Here's What You Need to Use Windows XP Professional

•PC with 300 megahertz or higher processor clock speed recommended; 233 MHz minimum required (single or dual processor system);* Intel Pentium/Celeron family, or AMD K6/Athlon/Duron family, or compatible processor recommended
•128 megabytes (MB) of RAM or higher recommended (64 MB minimum supported; may limit performance and some features)
•1.5 gigabytes (GB) of available hard disk space*
•Super VGA (800 x 600) or higher-resolution video adapter and monitor
•CD-ROM or DVD drive
•Keyboard and Microsoft Mouse or compatible pointing device



its funny.. the people at MICROSOFT appear to agree with me on this point.
oh wait.. IT WAS THEM I GOT THE INFO IN THE FIRST PLACE.

pls take your 6000+ posts and go learn something before posting again.
 

Doomulation

?????????????????????????
Don't take everything what they write literally. XP itself easily consumes about 256 mb of memory, not to mention all the other programs you have running easily consumes up to 512 mb of memory. I know this, as I have witnessed it MYSELF.
Now let's stop this stupid discussion before it turns into a flamewar.
 

squall_leonhart

The Great Gunblade Wielder
it won't become a flamewar.

on systems with 256mb and less alot more page swapping occurs.
i have and can again set up a XP installation to run in less then 100mbs simply by disabling the eye candy.
 

gman932

New member
I have the same problem with a

Athlon xp +2800
1g ddr....400 or something i think been awhile
ati 9800 pro

i think the next patch might fix it ...but if anyone finds anything out... let us know
 

Dragonix

New member
i got the same problem with pj64k, my system:
MotherBoard: MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (latest drivers)
CPU: AMD Athlon64 3200+
Ram: 1024MB (DualChannel (2*512))
GraphicAdapter: nVIDIA 6600GT (128MB Ram) (latest drivers)
OS: XP Prof - Service Pack1 (+All updates)

but on my second system, the pj64k runs without any problems:
CPU: AMD AthlonXP 1900+
Ram: 768 MB
MoBo: Asus A7V-600X
GraphicAdapter: ATi Radeon 9600XT (with the normal, latest catalyst driver)
OS: XP Prof - Service Pack1 (+All updates)


i would be very happy if you could help me!

edit: the windows "swap" file has on both systems the same size!
 
Last edited:

squall_leonhart

The Great Gunblade Wielder
Dragonix said:
i got the same problem with pj64k, my system:
MotherBoard: MSI K8T Neo2-FIR (latest drivers)
CPU: AMD Athlon64 3200+
Ram: 1024MB (DualChannel (2*512))
GraphicAdapter: nVIDIA 6600GT (128MB Ram) (latest drivers)
OS: XP Prof - Service Pack1 (+All updates)

but on my second system, the pj64k runs without any problems:
CPU: AMD AthlonXP 1900+
Ram: 768 MB
MoBo: Asus A7V-600X
GraphicAdapter: ATi Radeon 9600XT (with the normal, latest catalyst driver)
OS: XP Prof - Service Pack1 (+All updates)


i would be very happy if you could help me!

edit: the windows "swap" file has on both systems the same size!

research leads me to believe that the MSI K8T (Via?) board requires SP2. it has updated support for the chipset
 

squall_leonhart

The Great Gunblade Wielder
ok well. SP2 has updated Drivers for VIA based chipsets and has an updated memory management handler.

SP1 had some leaks in the memory management and SP2 patched that.
 

Top