D3D HAL issues
- Thread starter twistedlogic
- Start date
reallyjoel
New member
i have now reverted back to catalyst drivers 3.10 (the last in the 3.xx series, as far as i can tell) and that didnt solve the problem.. instead it introduced the exact same problem to 1964 instead..!! arghhhh
though i can still get OpenGL going in 1964. strange how OpenGL runs at about 3fps in PJ64..
i've now tried every possible solution and combination of solutions.. except for downgrading the OS, but im not sure i really wanna do that.. maybe i can run a Linux emulator, and rune Wine on that, that runs Win98, that in turn runs PJ64, that might just do it.
though i can still get OpenGL going in 1964. strange how OpenGL runs at about 3fps in PJ64..
i've now tried every possible solution and combination of solutions.. except for downgrading the OS, but im not sure i really wanna do that.. maybe i can run a Linux emulator, and rune Wine on that, that runs Win98, that in turn runs PJ64, that might just do it.
Last edited:
Trotterwatch
New member
Removing all PJ64 settings helps in that case....Modem said:
reallyjoel
New member
Trotterwatch said:
well, configuring a plugin in 1964 and then copying it over to PJ64 works too. I tried it to no avail
Trotterwatch
New member
I can understand it not working for you, but for the person using the Radeon 9000 it's a little odd.
reallyjoel
New member
why is that?
Trotterwatch
New member
Well isn't the Radeon 9000 pretty much a Radeon 8500 card with different memory/clock speed? So it should in theory act the same as this Radeon 8500.
Not sure about the Radeon9600 (I don't keep up with ATI's wacko numbering system too much).
Not sure about the Radeon9600 (I don't keep up with ATI's wacko numbering system too much).
zAlbee
Keeper of The Iron Tail
not quite... it's more of a stripped down 8500, with 1 less texture unit per pixel pipeline (4 pipelines total) and some other changed stuff.Trotterwatch said:
from http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1655 - 2nd page
