1964 is designed to be efficient, but also some of the authors coded a large part of the core on older machines. may be a more accurate way to put it...
Hmm.. true it does tend to work good with older systems but within a few years im sure 70% of people will have a Pentium 4 or 5 (Who know what the future holds )
Hmm.. true it does tend to work good with older systems but within a few years im sure 70% of people will have a Pentium 4 or 5 (Who know what the future holds )
If not amd superhammer++, heh.
But the fact is that people still have shitty systems.
And the fact that 1964 is very well coded in speed point. Don't mock them. They wanna enjoy emulation too.