Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Figure this...

  1. #1
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    71

    Question Figure this...

    Can an hexadecimal editor make posibble the expansion pack support or make playable games like F-Zero?.



    • Advertising

      advertising
      EmuTalk.net
      has no influence
      on the ads that
      are displayed
        
       

  2. #2
    Moderator aprentice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,390

    Re: Figure this...

    Originally posted by l@g
    Can an hexadecimal editor make posibble the expansion pack support or make playable games like F-Zero?.
    Yes, but i'm sure dominator can explain it better than me since he has gotten f-zero working on suprahle using a hex editor.

  3. #3
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    71
    Yes, is true, but using the source code is a different think. Please, if you don`t believe in my work, let it be. I`m sure there is too many that believe and are enjoying it now. Reproggaming an old semu source code is a very, very hard work, and is sad to see how it is totally destroyed and erased. Again, I only want to make this emu still more better and faster that it is, but is not a simply work...

  4. #4
    Meh...
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    1,516
    as far as im concerned l@g until you get games like majora's mask, poke stadium 1 and 2 and others to work, its not that big of deal, and also if you do get rid of all your errors that you caused than that would be better.
    The only forum I have more than 1,000 posts on! weeeeeeee bleep.

  5. #5
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    71
    Yes, I know but I`m working very, very hard on it, and believe, is not a simple think. Please, only be patient and let it be. Nothing more

  6. #6
    N64 Addict Duncan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    246
    And some of the problems peeps have had with your version can be caused by bad GUI changes or bad hex changes, as theres a difference between changing a byte and moving a byte, i know, ive seen it before while working on SHLE with Dominator.

    There is no way you used the leaked Uhle source code, and compiled it, by now around 10 of us have compared your version against other versions with Hex Workshop, and it dont take a rocket scientist to figure it out. If not, then prove us wrong....
    - Duncan

  7. #7
    omg h4x CpU MasteR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Yuma Arizona, USA
    Posts
    1,507
    A byte by byte comparison shows your hex editing suprahle

  8. #8
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    71
    I will keep working... your comments are valids (I understand you), but my work is real and will surprise you soon...
    Bye!

  9. #9
    Philosopher Warrior Tri-Force's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Heart:San Diego, Body: NY
    Posts
    970
    what if he really IS working on it and just happens to be using the same program that Ep and Real used to compile it
    I KILL ME!!!
    <img src="http://www.emutalk.net/attachment.php?s=&postid=65090">

  10. #10
    /me odd oDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    82
    Originally posted by Tri-Force
    what if he really IS working on it and just happens to be using the same program that Ep and Real used to compile it
    to get an identical binary to the release from epsilon and realityman he would have to have the same source code that they compiled the final version with (the leaked source doesnt seem to be final, it had errors that needed to be fixed to compile and it says "THIS IS A PRIVATE NONPUBLIC VERSION"), compile using the exact same compiler version, link version, etc with the same compile/link flags... maybe THEN he'd get the same exe.. but he doesnt have the same source as them so u can rule that out...

    then l@g is claiming that he has made all these revolutionary changes but a byte to byte comparison between the two exes (original and l@gs) shows that they are nearly identical! if huge changes to the code (as he claims) were made the resultant exe would be a LOT LOT different!

    and its funny how 99% of the changes to the exe are in the resource section...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •