Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6

    N64 windows config. utility

    My OS is Windows Vista. I read in the troubleshotting manual of PJ 64 that disabling background processes in Windows will help optimize the performance of PJ 64. If I go to Windows Configuration Utility and click on the "Processes" tab, which programs can I safey disable to help optimize the performance of PJ 64?



    • Advertising

      advertising
      EmuTalk.net
      has no influence
      on the ads that
      are displayed
        
       

  2. #2
    Moderator Allnatural's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Toledo, OH. USA
    Posts
    4,571
    That info is a bit outdated I think. Unless you have a specific app that's really bogging down your system (your entire system) I'd just leave well enough alone.

  3. #3
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    69
    The ones you know, so you can tell which ones you don´t need. But I recommend not to touch them at all, instead post your system specs, maybe it´s your hardware that is not good enough (the idea is, if your running vista on old hardware, programms could run slow, since vista uses a fair amount of your ram/cpu and enen gpu, if you´r using the aero design.)
    (yeah, i like to write stuff in "()" )
    Never need to overclock...

  4. #4
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6
    My specs are: P4 processor 3.2 GHz 512 MB DDR2 Ram (I know I need to get more ram)

    If I switch from the Aero design to the "Windows Classic" theme, will that help any?

  5. #5
    EmuTalk Member X-Fi6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    515
    You didn't tell us what your graphics card/integrated graphics chip is. So it depends.

  6. #6
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    69
    Yes, not toooo much though. As example, i have 2gb (ddr2)RAM, vista uses <30% of it in idle, that makes ~614 mb. By using the vista basis design/anything but aero, the RAM usage drops by <5%, that makes ~512 mb (which kinda makes me wonder how your pc can handle it ^^"). Also your gfx card/chip won´t have to bother doing the 3d interface/transparence stuff anymore.

    So theoretically, this could help a little. Still, try to update you gfx drivers by downloading them from the official site of the company that developed your card/chip, since doing it with windows update sucks because of the driver versions they offer.... And you are right about the ram upgrade imo.
    (yeah, i like to write stuff in "()" )
    Never need to overclock...

  7. #7
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6
    I'm not entirely sure what my current graphics chip is. I went into device manager and under "Display Adapters" it lists:

    Intel 82945G Express Chipset Family

    Is that my gfx chip?

  8. #8
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6
    OK, I think I found my graphics chip info...... I copy and pasted it below:


    Intel(R) Graphics Media Accelerator Driver Report




    Report Date: 08/11/2008
    Report Time[hr:mm:ss]: 15:39:26
    Driver Version: 7.14.10.1437
    Operating System: Windows Vista (TM) Business* , Service Pack 1 (6.0.6001)
    Default Language: English
    DirectX* Version: 10.0
    Physical Memory: 500 MB
    Minimum Graphics Memory: 8 MB
    Maximum Graphics Memory: 64 MB
    Graphics Memory in Use: 34 MB
    Processor: x86
    Processor Speed: 3192 MHZ
    Vendor ID: 8086
    Device ID: 2772
    Device Revision: 02

  9. #9
    16-bit Corpse | Moderator Agozer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Nokia Land
    Posts
    6,112
    You don't do a whole lot with just 64MB of video memory, not to mention it being shared. There isn't much to optimize. Jabo's Direct3D6 is what you should be using.

    I'm surprised Vista even runs with Intel chip.
    Last edited by Agozer; August 11th, 2008 at 21:51.
    My Site With Random Stuff (+ two custom ZSNES GUI fonts)



  10. #10
    Voted Least Likely to Succeed p_025's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    512
    The Intel chipset (in my laptop anyway) is designed to be DX10 compatible, and has a fair amount of memory. It's problem is sheer power, something which ALL Intel GFX chipsets (to my knowledge) are lacking. I'd assume it's the same story with his. I just do all my gaming on my desktop.
    Dolphin from SVN r7648:
    x86 Builds: r7648
    x64 Builds: r7648

    Desktop:
    OS: Windows XP Professional, Service Pack 3 | CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 (2 CPUs, 2.40GHz) | RAM: 2x Corsair XMS 2GiB DDR2, 2x Corsair XMS 1GiB DDR2 (6GiB total, 3.25 recognized by XP) | Video: EVGA NVidia GeForce 8800GT 512MiB | Audio: Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic | CD/DVD Drives of note: LG8163b DVD-R

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •