Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1

    whats more powerful? ps2 or gc

    simple question as that.
    if you compare these two links below it appears that the ps2 is more powerful (eventhough it came out earlier).
    am i missing something?

    http://www.vgescape.com/features/53/ps2-specs
    http://www.fiercegaming.com/gamecubespecs.shtml



    • Advertising

      advertising
      EmuTalk.net
      has no influence
      on the ads that
      are displayed
        
       

  2. #2
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    428
    The GC is more powerful than the PS2, and it boots games faster along with having better graphics.

  3. #3
    Sony battery Toasty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oregon, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,048
    Yep the GC has a faster CPU and GPU. You can compare all their specifications here and here.

  4. #4
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8
    Not only faster but GameCube has a better quality graphics...

  5. #5
    Sony battery Toasty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oregon, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,048
    Faster GPU = more graphics drawn per second = better quality graphics.

  6. #6
    (Y) Olly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, England
    Posts
    42
    Wow, who'd have thought. I've always thought the PS2 to be more powerful than the GC! But then the graphics on GC quite often match or are better than the PS2's...

    I never would have thought, I always thought the PS2 to be more powerful than the GC. Guess everyone was wrong!
    Last edited by Cyberman; January 23rd, 2008 at 01:29. Reason: double post

  7. #7
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida, US
    Posts
    220
    since the GC is more pwerful than the ps2, is that why u need a faster computer
    to run GC emulation?
    Desktop:
    OS: Windows XP professional
    CPU: Pentiun Dual Core(2x 1.60Ghz)
    MEMORY: 2GB of DDR2, 150GB HDD

  8. #8
    Voted Least Likely to Succeed p_025's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    512
    Not necessarily. Just about any GameCube emulator out these days is not extremely efficient, and speed should improve with future releases, hence why the more recent x64 version is faster than x86 versions.
    But what future releases?
    Dolphin from SVN r7648:
    x86 Builds: r7648
    x64 Builds: r7648

    Desktop:
    OS: Windows XP Professional, Service Pack 3 | CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 (2 CPUs, 2.40GHz) | RAM: 2x Corsair XMS 2GiB DDR2, 2x Corsair XMS 1GiB DDR2 (6GiB total, 3.25 recognized by XP) | Video: EVGA NVidia GeForce 8800GT 512MiB | Audio: Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic | CD/DVD Drives of note: LG8163b DVD-R

  9. #9
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1
    that was my next question spartan. i've been following pcsx2 (ps2) emulator and they have made great progress. i was trying to compare the progress between the 2.

  10. #10
    EmuTalk Member FlotsamX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    322
    Well: pcsx2 boasts a 60% compatability rate, internet play, controller support, frameskip, lots of things.

    Comparing it to Dolphin... meh.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •