Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1

    Video Card Question

    I have a Duron 950 mhz processor and 320 MB of Ram. I was wondering if upgrading my video card from an ATI Rage Fury Pro to a GeForce2 MX200 64MB would have a big difference on performance when I use Project 64 or 1964. Also is there a big difference between the GeForce2 MX200 64MB and the GeForce2 MX400 64MB? Thanks for any feedback.



    -Zack Morris


    • Advertising

      advertising
      EmuTalk.net
      has no influence
      on the ads that
      are displayed
        
       

  2. #2
    conkerman conkerman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    213
    im not too familiar with the ati rage or whatever, but i had a tnt2 card, which is pretty crappy, and it ran stuff at ok speed. sorry about that
    to answer your second question, the speed difference between the mx200 vs. mx400 wont be that big(compared to the price difference). mx400 wont be that much faster, and with both geforce's having 64mb ram, u'll be fine. i have 64mb and i'm doin pretty good, but then again i have a 1.4 t-bird
    conkerman

  3. #3
    EmuTalk Member Muletman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    18
    dont bother getting any of them mx200/400 lack all thats good about geforce2's get pro or ultra i got a gainward 2 pro 64mb ddr 4.5ns golden sample its as close as you'll get to an ultra and it cost £130 and that was 6 months ago, BUT if i was you id wait save money and try get at least a geforce 3 pro ultra or geforce4
    T - Bird 1.2, Gainward Geforce 2 pro Golden Sample, 512mb, Micro$oft WindowsXP

  4. #4
    EmuTalk Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    9
    Your video card isn't fully supported according to something I read a Zophar's Domain.

    Most nVidia cards and the newer ATI's are good though. I use a GeForce 3 Ti 200 and it's great. I can get over 200fps with the frame limiter off in most games
    My Dell 8200 Specs:
    P4 1.80ghz - 400mhz FSB
    512mb PC800 RDRAM
    Geforce 3 Ti 200
    40gb IBM 7200rpm Hdd
    15" Flat Panel Monitor (same size as 17" tube)
    harmon/kardon HK695 speakers w/ subwoofer
    MS IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0 - USB Optical
    Dell Performance USB multimedia keyboard w/ 2 port USB hub
    Windows XP Pro/Windows 98se

  5. #5
    The Other Village Idiot Tk64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    149
    Originally posted by rewen
    Your video card isn't fully supported according to something I read a Zophar's Domain.

    Most nVidia cards and the newer ATI's are good though. I use a GeForce 3 Ti 200 and it's great. I can get over 200fps with the frame limiter off in most games
    Same here.
    Socket 423 Pentium 4 @ 1400 Mhz - 400MHz FSB
    GeForce 3 TI 200 4xAGP w/64mb DDR, overclocked to 250 core/550 DDR
    512 MB PC133 SDR SDRAM
    30 GB Maxtor Ultra DMA 100 HD
    USB Logitech Wingman Rumblepad
    1Mbit cable connection / 100MBit LAN
    Windows 2000 Pro
    SiliconGraphics 24-inch Trinitron monitor

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Oulu, Finland
    Posts
    3,271
    Originally posted by Muletman
    dont bother getting any of them mx200/400 lack all thats good about geforce2's
    Actually the geforce 2 mx cards where the first nvidia cards with dual-head, so they did have some features that the other gf2's didn't have



  7. #7
    I Am The Stig Martin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Malmö
    Posts
    3,814
    There's a board for Hardware discussion, moving this thread there.


    The Emulation64 Network offers you free hosting!
    Click here for requirements and contact info.

  8. #8
    Banned Olger901's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    246

    It HELPS

    YES it surely helps. I updated my old Ati Rage Fury Pro 32 Mb to an GeForce 2 MX 200 and 64 Mb DDR Ram and it increased the speed of my games sometimes with up to 200% or 300% and all games work fine now and before I had probs with some games. Trust me It's really worth it. Also for emulation I have worked with my old Ati Rage Fury Pro for 2 years and in my personal opinion it's nothing but BIG CRAP!! So it's REALLY worth your money trust me.

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Chester, England
    Posts
    5,216
    One thing, steer clear of the MXs with DDR ram, they are in fact slower than their SDR ram equivalents.

    This is due to memory bus constraints, the DDR versions always use a 64bit bus, whilst the SDR use a full 128 bit one. As DDR has higher latency than SDR also, then SDR wins.

    DDR on MX cards is nothing but a cheap con trick.

  10. #10
    roll for life sk8bloke22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    i dont live anywhere, im homeless
    Posts
    1,449
    u might as well search for a cheap gf2 gts or gf2 pro or something....they can be found for like £30 odd more than an mx if u look carefully....
    WinXP Professional 5.1 (Build #2600) CPU: AMD K7 Athlon XP, 1.67 GHz Video: Samsung SAMTRON 95P Plus(T)/95P on nVidia GeForce4 Ti 4200 (1280x1024x32bpp 60Hz) Sound: SB Audigy Audio [E800] Memory: Used: 156/512MB Uptime: 1h 46m 2s 81ms HD: Free: [C:] 27.93/38.16 GB Connection: 1-World Online via U.S. Robotics 56K FAX EXT @ 45200 bps (Rec: 8.14MB Sent: 0.81MB)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •