Project64's Wikipedia article urgently needs to be restarted!

Poobah

New member

• May 20, 2006

• #1

The Wikipedia article for Project64 is a disaster at the moment. Most of the information is biased towards 1964 and is poorly written.

If you (the reader) happen to be good at writing articles, then you should try working on Project64's one.

 

Smiff

Emutalk Member

• May 20, 2006

• #2

heh, i like Wikipedia and have seen that article.. but i wouldn't be comfortable writing anything there ("project64.. is weally weally great").. if any users want to, go ahead
npov! npov! NPOV!
yeah i thought it wasn't very good but thought that was just my bias.

 

Rapidgorgon

New member

• May 20, 2006

• #3

Or we could all work together to make one hel of an article that some other subjects could only wish to have?

 

B

Ballard

New member

• May 21, 2006

• #4

ferst we neid 2 find sumbuddy hoo can spel and gramer good!!111!!

 

Danny

Programmer | Moderator

• May 21, 2006

• #5

I would like to write a article on Project 64!

 

Propa McGanda

I'm too groovy to Post

• May 21, 2006

• #6

zion said:

I would like to write a article on Project 64!

Click to expand...

You're free to edit the existing wiki article, so go ahead. =p

 

Rapidgorgon

New member

• May 21, 2006

• #7

<off topic>

Ballard said:

ferst we neid 2 find sumbuddy hoo can spel and gramer good!!111!!

Click to expand...

English isn't everyone's native language, so let's be tolerant :flowers: .
</off topic>

I thought that the screenshot could use some improvement. So here's my try.

 

Danny

Programmer | Moderator

• May 21, 2006

• #8

Ok, ive edited the page. not very long but i think it's ok

 

Smiff

Emutalk Member

• May 21, 2006

• #9

no fog?! arggh, a bug! (the fog should be same as real system, thats what we've been always trying for).

also we don't support retexturing out of the box, yet, although that's in for 1.7

does sound more positive though