PDA

View Full Version : Drivers?


BUTTABALLA999
February 26th, 2006, 04:45
Does anyone know a good driver for nvidia geforce 64 PCI?
squall_leonhart
February 26th, 2006, 10:28
theres no such thing as a geforce 64
BUTTABALLA999
February 26th, 2006, 21:53
I meant Geforce 64mb sry.
gandalf
February 27th, 2006, 02:16
thereīs a lot of GeForce with 64MB of ram
Clements
February 27th, 2006, 02:24
Profile says GeForce4 MX 4000.
Tagrineth
February 27th, 2006, 02:27
Eww, MX4000...

Try the latest, if that doesn't work then I somehow doubt many people here would be able to help. >_>
NES_player4LIFE
February 27th, 2006, 03:24
check this site for drivers
http://www.nvidia.com/content/drivers/drivers.asp
smcd
February 27th, 2006, 04:32
The 43.xx series or 52.xx (i think) work well for the gf4mx series. I had trouble installing the 43.xx series in xp with sp2 so i tried the 52.xx and it worked well
Tagrineth
March 1st, 2006, 01:23
You know, if the MX4000 was a 4MX, he'd be so much better off...
BUTTABALLA999
March 1st, 2006, 01:52
ok thx. I was just wondering cause i thought it was a bad video card
BUTTABALLA999
March 1st, 2006, 02:14
check this site for drivers
http://www.nvidia.com/content/drivers/drivers.asp

First i tried the cd that came with it, then i went to that site you gave me, didn't work either. Those didn't work so i tried EVGA.com.
Miretank
March 1st, 2006, 04:12
ok thx. I was just wondering cause i thought it was a bad video card
But it IS a bad video card...
Use 52.14 or 52.16 drivers. They're the best I've ever tried. Go to http://www.guru3d.com and search for it there.
squall_leonhart
March 1st, 2006, 11:25
You know, if the MX4000 was a 4MX, he'd be so much better off...

the mx4000 is a 4mx

its a rebadged mx440
Clements
March 1st, 2006, 14:45
Nope, it is even worse than a regular GeForce4 MX 440. The MX 4000 has 64-bit memory clocked 100MHz slower. This results in less than half the memory bandwidth than an MX 440.
Miretank
March 1st, 2006, 16:29
Nope, it is even worse than a regular GeForce4 MX 440. The MX 4000 has 64-bit memory clocked 100MHz slower. This results in less than half the memory bandwidth than an MX 440.

I hate ya :P
BUTTABALLA999
March 1st, 2006, 16:50
But it IS a bad video card...
Use 52.14 or 52.16 drivers. They're the best I've ever tried. Go to http://www.guru3d.com and search for it there.
Aight. I'll try it and post again on the results. Thanks for the help.
BUTTABALLA999
March 1st, 2006, 16:53
Nope, it is even worse than a regular GeForce4 MX 440. The MX 4000 has 64-bit memory clocked 100MHz slower. This results in less than half the memory bandwidth than an MX 440.
Clements, you're a genuis. I can't believe i fell for that salesman... "Oh yeah, this is a great card."
Now i see what you mean
gandalf
March 1st, 2006, 18:46
Nope, it is even worse than a regular GeForce4 MX 440. The MX 4000 has 64-bit memory clocked 100MHz slower. This results in less than half the memory bandwidth than an MX 440.
worse
MX4000=32-bit bus for 64MB models
64-bit for 128MB models

anyway, itīs the worse Nvidia card ever


and the saleman, they only want a sale, and they make anything to make an sale
squall_leonhart
March 3rd, 2006, 13:45
i doubt that gandalf, after some research the mx4000 is 64bit on both versions, you can't have a 32bit bus on a card like this, its just useless...
compres
March 5th, 2006, 18:01
Well it is a bad video card performance wise.
Tagrineth
March 5th, 2006, 23:11
Nope, it is even worse than a regular GeForce4 MX 440. The MX 4000 has 64-bit memory clocked 100MHz slower. This results in less than half the memory bandwidth than an MX 440.

Thanks for saving me the trouble :flowers: