Smiff
February 28th, 2002, 02:05
yeah I've become something of a news providing service here:
A woman in Baton Rouge, Louisiana is suing Nintendo for "unspecified damages" after her 30-year old son died during a marathon session on his N64. the unfortunate man died after hitting his head on a table during a seizure while playing with the console.
The man first started suffering seizures after buying his N64 in 1999, but he continued playing on the console for anything up to eight hours a day, six days a week, according to an AP report.
He played despite the now-standard epilepsy warning which comes with every Nintendo game. This informs players that "some people may have seizures or black outs triggered by light flashes, such as while .. playing video games, even if they have never had a seizure before".
The warning adds that "anyone who has had a seizure, loss of awareness, or other symptom linked to an epileptic condition should consult a doctor before playing a video game", and ends by suggesting in big capital letters that you should "stop playing immediately" if you experience any of these symptoms while using the console. It's also hard to see how the woman can seriously expect to sue Nintendo for "her son's lost future earnings" when he was a thirty year old who spent 48 hours a week sat in front of the TV playing Mario.
Nintendo denies any responsibility for the death, although in a similar case last year (also in Louisiana) a jury decided that the company "did not provide an adequate warning concerning the risk of seizures".
The jury did determine that the console in question (a SNES) "was not unreasonably dangerous in design". Which is nice to know.
http://theregister.co.uk/content/54/24220.html
http://www.eurogamer.net/
A woman in Baton Rouge, Louisiana is suing Nintendo for "unspecified damages" after her 30-year old son died during a marathon session on his N64. the unfortunate man died after hitting his head on a table during a seizure while playing with the console.
The man first started suffering seizures after buying his N64 in 1999, but he continued playing on the console for anything up to eight hours a day, six days a week, according to an AP report.
He played despite the now-standard epilepsy warning which comes with every Nintendo game. This informs players that "some people may have seizures or black outs triggered by light flashes, such as while .. playing video games, even if they have never had a seizure before".
The warning adds that "anyone who has had a seizure, loss of awareness, or other symptom linked to an epileptic condition should consult a doctor before playing a video game", and ends by suggesting in big capital letters that you should "stop playing immediately" if you experience any of these symptoms while using the console. It's also hard to see how the woman can seriously expect to sue Nintendo for "her son's lost future earnings" when he was a thirty year old who spent 48 hours a week sat in front of the TV playing Mario.
Nintendo denies any responsibility for the death, although in a similar case last year (also in Louisiana) a jury decided that the company "did not provide an adequate warning concerning the risk of seizures".
The jury did determine that the console in question (a SNES) "was not unreasonably dangerous in design". Which is nice to know.
http://theregister.co.uk/content/54/24220.html
http://www.eurogamer.net/