View Full Version : 3D Now!
Matata
December 9th, 2003, 02:32
Is there a way to deactivate the usage of 3D Now!???
Eagle
December 9th, 2003, 03:18
I believe you can deactivate them in the Nvidia drivers.
Reznor007
December 9th, 2003, 07:37
I don't know of any way to disable 3d now on the CPU.
Disabling it in the nVidia driver just makes the driver itself not use it.
Stezo2k
December 9th, 2003, 09:50
why would you want to deactivate it?
Matata
December 9th, 2003, 16:14
Too see if I can fix a problem with eVoodoo.
Matata
December 9th, 2003, 16:14
Can you list me the stepsa to deactivate it in the drivers because I canīt find it.
Eagle
December 9th, 2003, 17:09
Can you list me the stepsa to deactivate it in the drivers because I canīt find it.
Well on the newer drivers you can only choose to do it on the OpenGL. Its listed as "Disable support for Enhanced CPU instruction sets". This will however disable more than just 3D Now, it will also disable any other instructions given to the video card by the CPU. For intel it disables MMX capabilities (with relation to the video, other MMX instructions will remain active)
Matata
December 9th, 2003, 17:27
Thanks, Iīll see what happens.
Stezo2k
December 10th, 2003, 00:23
Too see if I can fix a problem with eVoodoo.
i seriously doubt a CPU enhancement would effect compatibility with a emulator etc... else there would be options all over emulators/games =]
Matata
December 10th, 2003, 01:23
crap, I just canīt fix this problem, eVoodoo is slow as hell exept for vrsion 2.5
Stezo2k
December 10th, 2003, 02:20
crap, I just canīt fix this problem, eVoodoo is slow as hell exept for vrsion 2.5
why not use version 2.5 then?
to be honest, your TNT2 is letting your computer down the most when it comes to gaming performence
Matata
December 10th, 2003, 02:43
because 2.5 has a lot of GFX errors ( a lot of things are black and so on)
Matata
December 10th, 2003, 02:45
one of the glide and evoodoo testers told me that the problem was that glide 0.5 didinīt had good compatibility with evoodoo.
Eagle
December 10th, 2003, 04:14
Matata, Stezo is absolutely right. If you really want to improve your gaming experience, Gefore 4 MX cards are not expensive at all. Were talking $30 - $50 US. Believe me its a very good investment if your still using a TNT2.
Matata
December 10th, 2003, 04:29
The problem is I live in Argentina and the computer related stuff itīs pretty expensive here because the money in my country is devaluated but Iīll see if I can spend some money in it, are TNT 2 really that bad???
NeTo
December 10th, 2003, 05:05
Well, not that bad, geographically speaking. Here in South America cards like the GeForce2 MX are still very respected (i'll even consider buying another one soon lol). You should compare prices, and if you can get your hands on a geforce4 mx, it will be a very good buy, (again, geographically speaking :) ).
Here in Chile, at least, Asus cards with geforce4 mx, tv out and 64mb ram have very good prices. I don't if the situation is the same at the other side mountain range.
You could also try with older versions of evoodo and glide64. I think glide64 3.x is has very good compatibility with evoodoo, uhm but i'm not sure....
Kaoss626
December 10th, 2003, 07:30
Cut and pasted from across the web, a TNT2 is _really_ that slow compaired to some of the newer cards out there. It was really good, but it really is a bit slow most modern 3d applicaions.
official specs on the final revision of nVidias Riva TNT2 are listed below:
* 125MHz 150+MHz 128-bit 2D/3D core
* 2nd Generation 128-bit TwiN Texel architecture
* 300 Megapixels per second
* 9 Million Triangles per second peak processing power
* Resolution support up to 2046 x 1536
* PCI/AGP Support AGP 2X/4X Texturing Support
* 16/32-bit 3D Rendering Support
* 32-bit Z/stencil Buffer
* 300MHz Integrated RAMDAC
* 16/32MB SDRAM
* 2048 x 2048
* Texture Support Optional NTSC/PAL Video Out
* Optional Digital Flat Panel Output
* Direct3D/OpenGL API Support
* OpenGL ICD for Windows 9x, NT 3.5x, NT 4.0, and Windows 2000
Geforce2
* nVidia GeForce-2 MX
* 32MB 128-bit SDRAM
* Integrated 350MHz RAMDAC
* Resolution up to 2048x1536, True Color @ 60Hz
* 175MHz core,166MHz SDRAM clock
* 2 Dual-Texturing Pipelines
* 4 Texels per Clock HyperTexel-Architecture
* 350 MegaPixel, 700-MegaTexel Fill Rate
* 20M Triangles/sec Hardware Transform and Lighting
* 4X AGP with Fast Writes/AGP 2x/1x compatible
* Hardware Acceleration for Microsoft DirectX 7.x, DirectX 8, and OpenGL 1.2 ICD
* DirectX Texture Compression Support
* NTSC/PAL TV-Output with flicker filter
* Digital TwinView Display Architecture for Simultaneous Dual Display
Geforce 4 MX
Specifications of the MX480
MX440-8X (NV18) chipset
AGP 8x
Memory interface 64MB DDR
Memory bus 128bit
GPU clock speed 275 MHz
Memory clock speed 512 MHz
Memory Bandwidth 8.2 GB/sec
Fill Rate (texel/sec) 1.1 billion
concentrate mainly on the 300 million texture pixles per second for the tnt2, 700 million for the geforce 2 and 1.1 billion for the geforce 4 MX. Figgure in also the fact that the triangles per second ramp up significantly as well and its easy to see that if you are rendering an image with lots of polygons, things slow down a lot compaired to modern hardware. For N64 emulation I really would be hard pressed to run a GPU slower than a Geforce 2 unless I was willing to live with stutteringly slow frame rates from time to time.
also what things don't say is that the geforce 4 is a 5th generation of the basic archetecture of the tnt while the tnt2 is second generation. if it runs on the tnt or tnt2 it will run way faster on the later cards
Knuckles
December 10th, 2003, 07:31
well, I had a TNT2 ( but a shitty Model64 one) emulators were running ok but evoodoo was slow as hell. Now, I got a GF4MX and everything's better and faster (MX are really better than I expected).And if you want a new card for low prices, you still can look on ebay
Matata
December 10th, 2003, 14:32
The one I have is a Model64 snif :( Seems like I need a new one. Iīll look at mercadolibre.com (Argentinaīs eBay) and see if I can find one.
Eagle
December 10th, 2003, 17:32
Let us know how that goes. The reason we mentioned this is in your hardware list, you have a nice processor, plenty of memory and a good hard drive, but your TNT2 is holding you back.
Matata
December 10th, 2003, 19:01
Yep I always wanted to get a new one but it wasnīt necessary so I didinīt get one, plus Iīm looking for a card with TV out to watch DivX in the TV.
Matata
December 10th, 2003, 20:05
Aww men I canīt decide if buy the card or not, are you guys completly sure this will fix my speed problem????
Eagle
December 10th, 2003, 23:44
I cant guaruntee it will fix your specific speed problem, but it is likely that it will. Furthermore it will overall improve your system with regards to gaming.
Matata
December 11th, 2003, 14:59
Well seems that the Video Card is gonna have to wait a little because Iīm going to buy a Digital Camera first.
sytaylor
December 11th, 2003, 15:13
TNT2's were good 4 years ago, but now they're showing their age
Matata
December 11th, 2003, 15:39
Yeah but I think that insted of buying a new Video Card Iīll save more money and buy a whole new computer and make it myself (so I can save a few bucks).
Matata
December 11th, 2003, 16:32
I was thinking: Can I tweak my TNT2 with RivaTurner to make it better and see if my slowdown problem solves? Iīm not sure about this because all the tutorial on the internet are for GeForce or better card (to make the card a Quadro 2 or better).
Is it dangerous to do this? Or my card is too old to tweak it?
jollyrancher
December 11th, 2003, 20:51
There's a program called TNTCLK http://thetechzone.com/downloads/tntclk12.zip that will overclock it.
Matata
December 11th, 2003, 21:43
whatīs overcloking?
RJARRRPCGP
December 12th, 2003, 01:33
whatīs overcloking?
Overclocking is setting the clock frequency above the factory default setting to get a speed increase.
Matata
December 12th, 2003, 02:12
But isnīt that goingi to broke it? Or overheat it?
Matata
December 12th, 2003, 05:18
Well, I made up my mind: Iīm going to buy a GeForce but Iīm not sure if I should buy a GeForce 2 or 4. Is there really a big difference?
sytaylor
December 12th, 2003, 09:58
Yes, the Geforce 4 is much faster and fully supports direct x 8 in hardware. (unless you get the geforce 4mx).. see if you can pick up a geforce ti4200, which is for me the entry level card right now
Matata
December 12th, 2003, 15:40
Ok Iīll see if I can get one. Thanks.
Matata
December 12th, 2003, 16:02
Well, itīs decided: Iīm going to buy a XFX GeForce 4 MX 440 64MB DDR AGP8X w/TV-Out.
But I donīt know if itīs going to work with my motherboard. How can I know????
I have an AMD Duron 750 Mhz PCChips Systemboard M810 Series V3.0a
Eagle
December 13th, 2003, 02:00
Overclocking is setting the clock frequency above the factory default setting to get a speed increase.
Yes, Some TNT2 Cards were purely designed for overclocking (i.e. Diamond Multimedia's TNT2) , but if you set it to high you can crash your computer and maybe even damage your hardware so be carefull
jollyrancher
December 13th, 2003, 05:36
Well, itīs decided: Iīm going to buy a XFX GeForce 4 MX 440 64MB DDR AGP8X w/TV-Out.
Mmmmm... I usually stay out of these video card debates, but I don't think you'll find many people in this forum who would reccomend that card for the value or performance. If you're going with a Geforce and you want something cheap (around $50-70), get the Ti4200. If you don't want to pay that much, get a Geforce3 (either model)... it's better than the Geforce4 MX and probably cheaper too.
Matata
December 13th, 2003, 06:39
Ti4200 are damn expensive and I canīt find any GeForce 3.
Eagle
December 13th, 2003, 09:49
Well, itīs decided: Iīm going to buy a XFX GeForce 4 MX 440 64MB DDR AGP8X w/TV-Out.
But I donīt know if itīs going to work with my motherboard. How can I know????
I have an AMD Duron 750 Mhz PCChips Systemboard M810 Series V3.0a
Carefull there, while I have no experience with them, I have heard AGP 8X cards are not backwards compatible (meaning they will only work in an AGP 8X slot). If your motherboard as a 4X AGP slot you will definately want to get the 4X version. Granted I could be completely wrong and I'm just repeating idle rumor as well.
Eagle
December 13th, 2003, 09:54
Then again the specs say it will run on AGP 2.0 slots but mentions nothing about AGP 1.0. Sooo if your AGP slot supports 2X/4X/8X AGP then I guess your safe.
http://www.xfxgraphics.com/product_view.php?sku=PVT18KQT
vleespet
December 13th, 2003, 12:51
I'm not sure about this, but try selecting device #2 in the Glide64 config. Sometimes d3d-programs see 3dnow as a d3d device.
Matata
December 13th, 2003, 14:48
My motherboard is 4X AGP slot but the guy who sells the card says it works on AGP 8X, 4x and 2X, is that possible or heīs wrong?
Is it a good card?
Kaoss626
December 13th, 2003, 16:08
Matata.... just fine
the difference is AGP cards originally ran on 5 volt power. AGP 2 standard is 3 volt power. If you'r board supports AGPx2 and x4 you can more than adequately rest asured that it _will_ work.
as for AGPx8 it is fully reverse compatable except for a 5 volt agp slot. _No_ 3 volt AGP card will be compatable with a 5 volt slot. You can put a AGPx8 card in a 3 volt AGPx2 slot just fine it just won't utilize the extra bandwith of AGPx8. You can also put a AGPx2 card in a AGPx8 slot (provided they are both 3 volt). Again it's limited by the slower of the two.
Matata
December 13th, 2003, 22:35
Ok, thanks for clearing that out but I found a GeForce FX5200 128MB DDR TV really really REALLY cheap ($100). This one should work too shouldnīt it???
Matata
December 13th, 2003, 23:05
oh and by the way $100 = U$S 33
Kaoss626
December 13th, 2003, 23:22
thats even better than a Geforce4MX
Matata
December 13th, 2003, 23:37
But itīs compatible with my motherboard isnīt it??
Kaoss626
December 13th, 2003, 23:49
cut and pasted straight from the motherboard manual
Key Features
The key features of this mainboard include:
Socket-462 Processor Support
Ļ Supports AMD Athlon/Duron processors
Ļ Supports 200 MHz Front-Side Bus
Processors are automatically configured using firmware and a synchronous Host/DRAM Clock Scheme.
Memory Support
Ļ Two DIMM slots for 168-pin SDRAM memory modules
Ļ Support for 100/133 MHz memory bus
Ļ Maximum installed memory is 2 x 512MB = 1GB
Expansion Slots
Ļ One AMR slot for a special audio/modem riser card
Ļ One optional AGP4X slot for AGP 2.0-compliant interface
Ļ Two 32-bit PCI slots for PCI 2.2-compliant bus interface.
Onboard IDE channels
Ļ Primary and Secondary PCI IDE channels
Ļ Support for PIO (programmable input/output) modes
Ļ Support for Multiword DMA modes
Ļ Support for Bus Mastering and Ultra DMA 33/66/100 modes
Power Supply and Power Management
Ļ ATX power supply connector
Ļ ACPI and previous PMU support, suspend switch, keyboard power on/off
Ļ Supports Wake on Modem, Wake on LAN and Wake on Alarm
!One optional AGP4X slot for AGP 2.0-compliant interface!
I'm certain any geforce2 or later (ie geforce4 or geforceFX) will work
to the best of my knowledge, anything AGPx2 is inherently AGP v2.0 and this board being AGPx4 apears to be no exception
Matata
December 13th, 2003, 23:56
Great, so itīs decided Iīll get this card. Thanks all of you for your big help. Iīll tell how are the things going when I get it.
Eagle
December 14th, 2003, 02:02
Great, so itīs decided Iīll get this card. Thanks all of you for your big help. Iīll tell how are the things going when I get it.
Yeah thats not a bad price either, its about $50 US here.
Matata
December 14th, 2003, 02:50
I canīt belive this. The guy that was going to sell me the card cancelled, crap! Iīm never going to get another one at such a good price!
Eagle
December 14th, 2003, 03:01
I canīt belive this. The guy that was going to sell me the card cancelled, crap! Iīm never going to get another one at such a good price!
They arent that expensive really. Like I said, 50-60 US doallars.
Matata
December 14th, 2003, 03:22
nope here in Argentina they are 90 US Dollars.
RJARRRPCGP
December 16th, 2003, 19:50
3D Now!, like SSE is an internal component of Athlon processors, thus any Athlon processor based system includes 3D Now!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.