...
Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
June 8th, 2002, 20:39 #1Moderator
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,390
Why bravheart shouldnt be allowed to wear a kilt
-
Advertising
- EmuTalk.net
- has no influence
- on the ads that
- are displayed
-
June 8th, 2002, 21:51 #2Philosopher Warrior
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Location
- Heart:San Diego, Body: NY
- Posts
- 970
there goes MY breakfast
meaning i just threw it up not meaning YUMM. . .BREAKFASTI KILL ME!!!
<img src="http://www.emutalk.net/attachment.php?s=&postid=65090">
-
June 8th, 2002, 22:18 #3Emutalk Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 8
that's ghey. r u still havin that pic on your hd?
peace out
-
June 9th, 2002, 00:04 #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- Wales
- Posts
- 4,727
*lol*
He's a true Scot, then.
TBE 2011 - this time it's real.
-
June 9th, 2002, 00:47 #5amiga nut
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- london england
- Posts
- 87
thats damn funny. and 'thagigolo', it's only gay if it turns you on
asta la vista signature box
-
June 10th, 2002, 00:19 #6Administrator
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Keith's house
- Posts
- 46
Hahaha... classic... kilts rox0r
Stuart Macdonald
-------------------------------------------
Emulation64.com Server Admin
* stuart at emulation64 dot com*
-------------------------------------------
-
June 11th, 2002, 01:52 #7Long gone...
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 271
Why call them kilts, essentially they are skirts aren't they?
-
June 11th, 2002, 01:58 #8aka Alshain
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- somewhere between fantasy and reality
- Posts
- 3,365
Belive it or not, they had Kilts before they had Skirts, so why call it a Skirt?Originally posted by Sukh
Why call them kilts, essentially they are skirts aren't they?Those who hope in the lord will renew their strength, they will soar on wings like eagles.
-Isaiah 40:31
-
June 11th, 2002, 18:23 #9Administrator
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Keith's house
- Posts
- 46
No, they're not skirts, nor are they anything like skirts. I will forgive you for saying so this one time, so now I can educate you and you will never make this mistake again... so here's the difference between kilts and skirts:Originally posted by Sukh
Why call them kilts, essentially they are skirts aren't they?
- Kilts are KNEE-LENGTH. They are never any shorter, never any longer. Skirts can be any length they like (as short as possible is always good)
- Kilts are used to show national/family pride by their pattern (tartan). For example, I have a kilt made of Macdonald tartan. There is also a McDonald and MacDonald tartan, and probably a few more Macdonald tartans too depending on the origins of the family.
- Kilts are NOT sewen together - they are basically one long piece of pleated material, which you wrap around your waist and then fasten. Skirts you normally step in to.
- Kilts are worn with a belt. Ever seen a skirt with a belt?
- Kilts bear such accoutrements as sporrans (fur pouch thingy at the front of the kilt), dirks and sgian-dubhs (dagger things). Now, apart from on your girlfriend Sukh, ever seen a dagger on a skirt?
And I could go on. After the First World War, the Germans rated the 51st Highland Division as the most formidable of all enemies they came across. The bloody British government banned the wearing of kilts after the defeat of Bonnie Prince Charlie basically because they were scared.
So in conclusion... DON'T FUCK WITH THE KILT.Stuart Macdonald
-------------------------------------------
Emulation64.com Server Admin
* stuart at emulation64 dot com*
-------------------------------------------
-
June 11th, 2002, 19:03 #10I Am The Stig
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Malmö
- Posts
- 3,814
ROFL
