Glide64 'Napalm' Public Release 1.0.
Therer will be a linux port for mupen64plus ??![]()
i hope so.![]()
Thx for your job
http://glide64.emuxhaven.net/
Glide64 'Napalm' Public Release 1.0.
Therer will be a linux port for mupen64plus ??![]()
i hope so.![]()
Thx for your job
http://glide64.emuxhaven.net/
I second that. The release on the webpage is binary only. I hope the source is made available
Wow, really impressive improvements.
Last edited by Surkow; April 23rd, 2008 at 23:10.
It probably is. I really wish someone would enforce GPL around the emu-scene, because It begins to lose it's value when people pull shit like this. Not to say i don't respect the developers, but if this is GPL, then they aren't respecting GPL either. I wouldn't be so mad if this were the first time, but it's most definitely not the first time. More like the 4th or 5th, as far as i remember (I have not been here that long though)
but glide64 does not appear to be gpl'd? so... http://glide64.emuxhaven.net/sources.php looking through the help file and the previous code release i couldn't find anything. The wrapper may or may not be, I can't easily find info in the packages shown there...
Last edited by smcd; April 28th, 2008 at 23:54.
Sheesh!It probably is. I really wish someone would enforce GPL around the emu-scene, because It begins to lose it's value when people pull shit like this. Not to say i don't respect the developers, but if this is GPL, then they aren't respecting GPL either. I wouldn't be so mad if this were the first time, but it's most definitely not the first time. More like the 4th or 5th, as far as i remember (I have not been here that long though)
Let me say this:
* Glide64 is GPL
* GlideHQ is GPL (source is released)
* Glitch64 (the wrapper) is NOT GPL (source is released)
* My gltest.exe code is NOT GPL, but BSD. It is BSD because I use a proprietary sound system. And I'm not going to use a opensource system, because I found none that play XM/S3M/IT/MOD modules perfect like BASS. (source is released, but no one cares). And no, I'm not going to use SDL. I rather use things that have zero bloat.
Look on the Glide64 forums for code.
Gonetz will release the code when he has time for the plugin, so just wait. Plus, porting over the current Glide64 Wonder Plus HQ code is strongly recommended before you attempt to port current Napalm code.
The Future of Emulation: Emulate a High End Computer on a Low End System
Main: Intel Core i7 (Lynnfiled) 860 (@3.802Ghz) | 8 GB DDR3-1333 | ATI XFX HD 5750 PCI-E | ATI High Definition Audio Device | 256 GB SSD + 3 TB Internal SATA2 + 4 TB external | Windows 7 Professional X64 SP1 MSDNAA
Netbook: Asus EeePC 1015PEM | Intel Atom Dual Core N550 (1,5GHz) | 2GB DDR3-1066 | Intel GMA 3150 | 250GB HDD | Win 7 Starter
Old One: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (2x2.5Ghz; S939) | MSI KbT Neo2-F V2.0 | 2x1GB Corsair Value VS1GBKIT400 | Radeon HD 3850 512 MB/AGP8x | Creative SB Audigy LS | 2TB (4x500GB SATA2 HDDs Raid0) | Windows 7 Business X64 SP1 MSDNAA
- SDL's audio sucks
- You have a point about GPL audio libraries.
I don't really care if it's GPL tbh. I just hope you don't withhold source. Glide64 is really good software and we wish for it to be available for Linux. We don't have the same plug ins as Windows - The best plug in we have is /probably/ Rice Video right now because Glide64 Wonder Plus crashes too much (at least on the Linux port, I didn't do too much heavy testing with it on Windows but I don't recall it crashing too much) but napalm is sure to give it at least a run for its money.
And the whole GPL thing, I still meant that seriously. I hate it when people abuse GPL as if it holds no grounds. My view on things, If you can't release source you can't release binaries of a GPL software. And that's legally true with GPL. Still though, I have extremely mixed strong views: It IS the work of the authors, and I did nothing to help develop it, but voilation of GPL drives me insane. (If I found out Mozilla put the Firefox source repositories to private and only did binary releases in the future, I would go mental when I tried to grab the source code again.)