Im stuck between getting a Duron 1.2 or a Thunderbird 1.2 (both 200FSB).
There's a fairly big differance in price (£30 which is about $40-45). Checking out some commmon benchmarks it seems like in most cases the duron will be about 10% slower.
Does anyone know if the bigger cache on the Thunderbird will make a differance when using PJ64?
Thanks,
BluDChyLD
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
January 24th, 2002, 04:00 #1EmuTalk Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 37
Duron vs Thunderbird - Big differance in PJ64?
-
Advertising
- EmuTalk.net
- has no influence
- on the ads that
- are displayed
-
January 24th, 2002, 09:18 #2Not a Moderator
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 1,589
get a duron, but get a FSB of 266, they run cooler and can be overclocked better
Quitters never Win, Winners never Quit; but those who never Win and never Quit are generally banned EmuTalk members.
-
January 24th, 2002, 09:23 #3EmuTalk Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- NH, USA
- Posts
- 94
i have a fan which pulls air in and one to pull out along with one on the processor(hopefully) but if i were to overclock using the gigabyte EasyTune, i believe i will need a couple more fans, probally one on the hard drives and another near the processor
My Specs:
Gigabyte Motherboard
1400 Athlon T-Bird
512 Mb SDram
Xtasy 5564 GeForce 2 AGP 64 MB
40 Gb Western Digital Hd
Windows 98, XP Pro
Reply With Quote
