View Full Version : Is adding RAM enough to improve performance?
mapzilla1
October 12th, 2007, 19:20
I got Chankast to work on my 1GHz machine! Amazing considering nulldc probably won't even run on anything less than 1.6GHz.
The framerate ranges between 15-35 fps. Slow but playable. Especially Power Stone, which clocks in a at smooth 30-35 fps.
Too bad I can't adjust the over/under clock (chankast doesn't recognize laptop + and - keys).
I going to be adding an additional 512 RAM. Hopefully I can gain another 10-15 fps. That would rock!
Has anyone else been able to significantly improve their DC emulation experience by adding RAM chips?
Trotterwatch
October 12th, 2007, 21:25
If your hard drive is active a lot when playing then it'll help.
Very unlikely to improve performance though, AFAIK Chankast is mainly CPU bound.
ultimateyahoo
October 26th, 2007, 17:20
If your hard drive is active a lot when playing then it'll help.
Very unlikely to improve performance though, AFAIK Chankast is mainly CPU bound.
how about a better 3D graphics card?
my machine is a lowly Sempron 1.5 ghz.. started out with a meager 256 mb... with an embarassingly pathetic (dont laugh now) Geforce2 card...
Still i was able to play some decent (or halfway decent) games.
I upgraded to 512mb and noticed a marked improvement. the 2D game Marvel vs Capcom is very playable compared to the 3D fighting games.
Now im thinking of getting a better (about time) 3D card.. an entry level Geforce6 card.. not the best available for sure but a far cry from my laughable geforce2 right now...
think it will help much?
Agozer
October 26th, 2007, 18:47
A better 3D card doesn't make as much difference as more RAM or a faster processor does. Granted though, a GeForce 6 will be much better for emulation than a GeForce 2. It boils down to the graphics card supporting enough "tricks" and graphics rendering features for the emulator to properly use them.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.